Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?

Objective: This study aims to determine whether three different methodological approaches used to assess poly-victimization that apply the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ; Finkelhor, Hamby, Ormrod, & Turner, 2005) identify the same group of adolescent poly-victims. Method: The sample c...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Segura, Anna, Pereda Beltran, Noemí, Guilera Ferré, Georgina
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Data de publicação:2018
País:España
Recursos:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositório:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/219415
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219415
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Víctimes
Qüestionaris
Adolescents
Victims
Questionnaires
Teenagers
id ES_adbb081caa659334f2d2fa90c6f42dfd
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/219415
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?Segura, AnnaPereda Beltran, NoemíGuilera Ferré, GeorginaVíctimesQüestionarisAdolescentsVictimsQuestionnairesTeenagersObjective: This study aims to determine whether three different methodological approaches used to assess poly-victimization that apply the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ; Finkelhor, Hamby, Ormrod, & Turner, 2005) identify the same group of adolescent poly-victims. Method: The sample consisted of 1,105 adolescents (590 males and 515 females), aged 12–17 years old (M = 14.52, SD = 1.76) and recruited from seven secondary schools in Spain. The JVQ was used to assess lifetime and past-year experiences of victimization. Results: Poly-victims were more likely to experience all types of victimization than victims, regardless of the method used. The degree of agreement between the methods for identifying poly-victimization was moderate for both timeframes, with the highest agreements being recorded between the one-above-the-mean number of victimizations and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) for lifetime, and between the top 10% and LCA for past-year victimization. Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians should be aware that the use of different methods to define poly-victimization may mean that different victims are identified. The choice of one method or another may have important implications. In consequence, focusing on how we operationalize poly-victimization should be a priority in the near future.Taylor & Francis2025202520182025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion18 p.application/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/219415Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1441352Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2018, vol. 19, num.3, p. 289-306https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1441352(c) International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation, 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/2194152026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
title Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
spellingShingle Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
Segura, Anna
Víctimes
Qüestionaris
Adolescents
Victims
Questionnaires
Teenagers
title_short Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
title_full Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
title_fullStr Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
title_full_unstemmed Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
title_sort Poly-victimization from different methodological approaches using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire: Are we identifying the same victims?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Segura, Anna
Pereda Beltran, Noemí
Guilera Ferré, Georgina
author Segura, Anna
author_facet Segura, Anna
Pereda Beltran, Noemí
Guilera Ferré, Georgina
author_role author
author2 Pereda Beltran, Noemí
Guilera Ferré, Georgina
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Víctimes
Qüestionaris
Adolescents
Victims
Questionnaires
Teenagers
topic Víctimes
Qüestionaris
Adolescents
Victims
Questionnaires
Teenagers
description Objective: This study aims to determine whether three different methodological approaches used to assess poly-victimization that apply the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire (JVQ; Finkelhor, Hamby, Ormrod, & Turner, 2005) identify the same group of adolescent poly-victims. Method: The sample consisted of 1,105 adolescents (590 males and 515 females), aged 12–17 years old (M = 14.52, SD = 1.76) and recruited from seven secondary schools in Spain. The JVQ was used to assess lifetime and past-year experiences of victimization. Results: Poly-victims were more likely to experience all types of victimization than victims, regardless of the method used. The degree of agreement between the methods for identifying poly-victimization was moderate for both timeframes, with the highest agreements being recorded between the one-above-the-mean number of victimizations and Latent Class Analysis (LCA) for lifetime, and between the top 10% and LCA for past-year victimization. Conclusions: Researchers and clinicians should be aware that the use of different methods to define poly-victimization may mean that different victims are identified. The choice of one method or another may have important implications. In consequence, focusing on how we operationalize poly-victimization should be a priority in the near future.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2025
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219415
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219415
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1441352
Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 2018, vol. 19, num.3, p. 289-306
https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2018.1441352
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation, 2018
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation, 2018
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 18 p.
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869416483651584000
score 15.811543

Registros relacionados