Methods proposed for monitoring the implementation of evidence-based research: a cross-sectional study

Objectives: Evidence -based research (EBR) is the systematic and transparent use of prior research to inform a new study so that it answers questions that matter in a valid, efficient, and accessible manner. This study surveyed experts about existing (e.g., citation analysis) and new methods for mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Puljak, L, Bala, MM, Zajac, J, Mestrovic, T, Buttigieg, S, Yanakoulia, M, Briel, M, Lunny, C, Lesniak, W, Pericic, TP, Alonso-Coello, P, Clarke, M, Djulbegovic, B, Gartlehner, G, Giannakou, K, Glenny, AM, Glenton, C, Guyatt, G, Hemkens, LG, Ioannidis, JPA, Jaeschke, R, Jorgensen, KJ, Martins-Pfeifer, CC, Marusic, A, Mbuagbaw, L, Echavez, JFM, Moher, D, Nussbaumer-Streit, B, Page, MJ, Pérez-Gaxiola, G, Robinson, KA, Salanti, G, Saldanha, IJ, Savovic, J, Thomas, J, Tricco, AC, Tugwell, P, van Hoof, J, Pieper, D
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p17572
Acceso en línea:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=17572
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Evidence-based research
Systematic reviews
Evidence synthesis
Monitoring
Research waste
Research value
Research methodology
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: Evidence -based research (EBR) is the systematic and transparent use of prior research to inform a new study so that it answers questions that matter in a valid, efficient, and accessible manner. This study surveyed experts about existing (e.g., citation analysis) and new methods for monitoring EBR and collected ideas about implementing these methods. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study via an online survey between November 2022 and March 2023. Participants were experts from the fields of evidence synthesis and research methodology in health research. Open-ended questions were coded by recurring themes; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative questions. Results: Twenty-eight expert participants suggested that citation analysis should be supplemented with content evaluation (not just what is cited but also in which context), content expert involvement, and assessment of the quality of cited systematic reviews. They also suggested that citation analysis could be facilitated with automation tools. They emphasized that EBR monitoring should be conducted by ethics committees and funding bodies before the research starts. Challenges identified for EBR implementation monitoring were resource constraints and clarity on responsibility for EBR monitoring. Conclusion: Ideas proposed in this study for monitoring the implementation of EBR can be used to refine methods and define responsibility but should be further explored in terms of feasibility and acceptability. Different methods may be needed to determine if the use of EBR is improving over time. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.