Impact of persistent and cleared preformed HLA DSA on kidney transplant outcomes

Preformed HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) only detected with Luminex have been associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation (KT). Their evolution after KT may modify this risk. We analyzed postransplant evolution of preformed...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Redondo Pachón, María Dolores, Pérez-Sáez, María José, Mir Fontana, M. Luisa, Gimeno Beltran, Javier, Llinàs-Mallol, Laura, García, Carmen, Hernández, Juan José, Yélamos López, José, Pascual Santos, Julio, Crespo Barrio, Marta
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Data de publicação:2018
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositório:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/35785
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2018.02.014
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Ronyons -- Trasplantació
Antibody-mediated rejection
Donor-specific antibodies
Kidney transplantation
Preformed
Descrição
Resumo:Preformed HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) only detected with Luminex have been associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation (KT). Their evolution after KT may modify this risk. We analyzed postransplant evolution of preformed DSA identified retrospectively and their impact on outcomes of 370 KT performed 2006-2014. Antibodies were monitored prospectively at 1-3-5 years after KT and if any dysfunction. Early acute ABMR was more frequent among patients with preformed DSA class-I or I + II than isolated class-II (29.4% vs 4.5%, p = 0.02). One year post-KT, 20 of 34 patients with functioning KT had persistent DSA. Preformed DSA class-II persisted more frequently than class-I/I + II (66.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.031). The only risk factor independently associated with persistence was pretransplant MFI. Patients with de novo DSA had the highest risk of ABMR (HR 22.2 [CI 6.1-81.2]). Although recipients with persisting preformed DSA had significantly increased ABMR risk (HR 14.7 [CI 6.5-33.0]), those with cleared preformed DSA also had a higher risk than those without DSA (HR 7.01 [CI 2.2-21.8]). Preformed DSA are a very important risk factor for ABMR and graft loss. Patients who clear preformed DSA still show an increased risk of ABMR and graft loss after KT