Craniofacial morphology/phenotypes influence on mandibular range of movement in the design of a mandibular advancement device.
Background The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the cran...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Málaga |
| Repositorio: | RIUMA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:riuma_______::62c68039862ac8c30df7ee4109648154 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10630/36298 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Mandíbula Maxilares Obstructive sleep apnea Mandibular advancement device Oral appliance design Mandibular position Vertical opening |
| Sumario: | Background The mandibular opening path movements have different directions according to the craniofacial morphology of the patient but always downward and backward, therefore increasing the collapse of the upper airway. The aim of this work is to determine if there is a relationship between the craniofacial morphology and the mandibular movement to help understand the impact on the mandibular position. Methods 52 students with full permanent dentition aged 19 to 23 years (mean 21.3 SD 1.7; 29 females and 23 males), participated in the study. Each subject had a lateral cephalometric radiograph taken. The opening angle was determined for two levels of vertical openings at 5 and 10 mm. Results The opening angle showed a greater variability between subjects ranging from 63.15 to 77.08 for 5 mm angle and from for 61.65 to 75.72 for the 10 mm angle. Differences of facial phenotypes was evident when comparing the individual dissoccluding angle of the low angle horizontal pattern and high angle vertical pattern. Conclusions The opening angle is related to craniofacial morphology with higher vertical anterior and shorter anteroposterior faces having a more horizontal path of mandibular movement than shorter vertical anterior and longer anteroposterior subjects who have a more vertical path. |
|---|