Menstrual Migraine Among Spanish University Students

Purpose This study sought to determine the prevalence of menstrual migraine among female university students at the Nursing Faculty of Ciudad Real and to determine possible risk factors. Design and methods A cross-sectional observational study was performed using a self-report questionnaire. Two hun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Fernández Martínez, Elia, Onieva Zafra, María Dolores, Abreu Sánchez, Ana, González Sanz, Juan D., Iglesias López, María Teresa, Fernández Muñoz, Juan José, Parra Fernández, María Laura
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositorio:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/29638
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10578/29638
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Headache
Menstrual migraine
Hormonal headache
Dolor de cabeza
Migraña menstrual
Dolor de cabeza hormonal
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose This study sought to determine the prevalence of menstrual migraine among female university students at the Nursing Faculty of Ciudad Real and to determine possible risk factors. Design and methods A cross-sectional observational study was performed using a self-report questionnaire. Two hundred and ninety-nine female university students participated in the study; all were enrolled in the 2017/2018 academic year at the Faculty of Nursing. Participants were over the age of 18 years and without any diagnosed gynecological pathology. The main measurement tools were menstrual migraine between days −2 and +3 of the menstrual cycle, over the previous six cycles. Results The prevalence of menstrual migraine was 45.15%, identifying the following possible risk factors: dysmenorrhea (OR 9.19; 1.62–6.28% CI), use of hormonal contraceptive methods (OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.30–5.20), menstrual irritability (OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.25–4.40), menstrual dizziness (OR 2.05; 95% CI % 1.12–3.75) and daily consumption of cola beverages (OR 1.85; 95% CI % 1.04–3.32). Conclusions The prevalence of this problem is high among our population and the approach is complex. Practice implications: It is necessary to continue to research the pharmacological measures and methods of pharmacological pain relief as well as interventions directed at lifestyle modifications considering the potential risk factors involved in menstrual migraine.