Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System

The gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels – dating from the 10th century – is considered “the most extensive example of the Northumbrian dialect known to us.” (Morell 1965: 163). From a linguistic point of view this gloss is exceptional, as it reflects language change in a stage that is already closer to...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Costa Rivas, Xoana
Formato: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/105492
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/105492
Access Level:acceso abierto
id ES_a8edea2fb34f7ef2ee91984888d7ae2a
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/105492
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal SystemCosta Rivas, XoanaThe gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels – dating from the 10th century – is considered “the most extensive example of the Northumbrian dialect known to us.” (Morell 1965: 163). From a linguistic point of view this gloss is exceptional, as it reflects language change in a stage that is already closer to Middle English than any other Old English dialect of the time. Multiple features of the language used in the gloss have been discussed in previous literature, such as the Northern Subject Rule (Cole, 2014), and the use of zero genitives, an element commonly linked to later periods in northern dialects (Rodríguez Ledesma, 2016). The aim of this dissertation is twofold. First, to analyse late Old Northumbrian strong verbs using the gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels as a source for linguistic data. Second, to compare this gloss with other glosses of the time: Rushworth and Durham, the latter glossed by the same scribe as Lindisfarne probably at a later date, as well as the first English translation of the Gospels in the West Saxon dialect. This dissertation aims to assess whether this innovative nature of late Old Northumbrian can be seen in strong verbs. I will be concentrating on two analogical processes affecting these verbs, namely, regularisation (from strong to weak) and vowel transference, as well as anomalous forms of strong verbs seen throughout Lindisfarne. The regularisation of strong verbs is a feature typically associated with the Middle English period, but that can already be seen throughout the Lindisfarne gloss. In 1937, Alan S. C. Ross noted that “a number of analogical weak forms to strong verbs, similar to those found in later English, occur in the preterit and past participle” (153) in the gloss. This process of analogy has also been mentioned in other publications, such as Campbell (1983) and Hogg & Fulk (2011). Despite this feature having been reported in previous linguistic research, there have not been – to the extent of my knowledge – any comprehensive and scientific analysis of the data. The aim of this study is to not only discuss which strong verbs are rendered as weak verbs in the gloss, but also to provide insights as to why it happens in those verbs in particular by looking at other factors such as frequency, verb class, meaning, and word origin. Moreover, my thesis adds to questions of scholarly research such as the authorship of the Lindisfarne and Durham glosses and the alleged copying of Lindisfarne for the composition of the Old Northumbrian Rushworth gloss (Ru2). My results conclude that the regularisation of strong verbs is a very prominent feature of Old Northumbrian, which sets this analogical process in a much earlier timeline than it had traditionally been considered to start. Moreover, it seems to be a key part of Aldred’s idiolect, as both the Lindisfarne and Durham glosses present similar rates of regularisation, in contrast with the results drawn from the other texts in my analysis. Other processes of simplification such as levelling by means of vowel transference between the plural and singular forms of the preterite also reveal the innovative nature of the Old Northumbrian dialect, although this process in not very prominent in either of the texts studied.Rodríguez Ledesma, M. NievesPons-Sanz, Sara MaríaSeoane Posse, ElenaFilología Inglesa (Lengua Inglesa)2020info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/105492reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1054922026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
title Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
spellingShingle Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
Costa Rivas, Xoana
title_short Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
title_full Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
title_fullStr Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
title_full_unstemmed Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
title_sort Language Change in Late Old Northumbrian: The Strong Verbal System
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Costa Rivas, Xoana
author Costa Rivas, Xoana
author_facet Costa Rivas, Xoana
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez Ledesma, M. Nieves
Pons-Sanz, Sara María
Seoane Posse, Elena
Filología Inglesa (Lengua Inglesa)
description The gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels – dating from the 10th century – is considered “the most extensive example of the Northumbrian dialect known to us.” (Morell 1965: 163). From a linguistic point of view this gloss is exceptional, as it reflects language change in a stage that is already closer to Middle English than any other Old English dialect of the time. Multiple features of the language used in the gloss have been discussed in previous literature, such as the Northern Subject Rule (Cole, 2014), and the use of zero genitives, an element commonly linked to later periods in northern dialects (Rodríguez Ledesma, 2016). The aim of this dissertation is twofold. First, to analyse late Old Northumbrian strong verbs using the gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels as a source for linguistic data. Second, to compare this gloss with other glosses of the time: Rushworth and Durham, the latter glossed by the same scribe as Lindisfarne probably at a later date, as well as the first English translation of the Gospels in the West Saxon dialect. This dissertation aims to assess whether this innovative nature of late Old Northumbrian can be seen in strong verbs. I will be concentrating on two analogical processes affecting these verbs, namely, regularisation (from strong to weak) and vowel transference, as well as anomalous forms of strong verbs seen throughout Lindisfarne. The regularisation of strong verbs is a feature typically associated with the Middle English period, but that can already be seen throughout the Lindisfarne gloss. In 1937, Alan S. C. Ross noted that “a number of analogical weak forms to strong verbs, similar to those found in later English, occur in the preterit and past participle” (153) in the gloss. This process of analogy has also been mentioned in other publications, such as Campbell (1983) and Hogg & Fulk (2011). Despite this feature having been reported in previous linguistic research, there have not been – to the extent of my knowledge – any comprehensive and scientific analysis of the data. The aim of this study is to not only discuss which strong verbs are rendered as weak verbs in the gloss, but also to provide insights as to why it happens in those verbs in particular by looking at other factors such as frequency, verb class, meaning, and word origin. Moreover, my thesis adds to questions of scholarly research such as the authorship of the Lindisfarne and Durham glosses and the alleged copying of Lindisfarne for the composition of the Old Northumbrian Rushworth gloss (Ru2). My results conclude that the regularisation of strong verbs is a very prominent feature of Old Northumbrian, which sets this analogical process in a much earlier timeline than it had traditionally been considered to start. Moreover, it seems to be a key part of Aldred’s idiolect, as both the Lindisfarne and Durham glosses present similar rates of regularisation, in contrast with the results drawn from the other texts in my analysis. Other processes of simplification such as levelling by means of vowel transference between the plural and singular forms of the preterite also reveal the innovative nature of the Old Northumbrian dialect, although this process in not very prominent in either of the texts studied.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11441/105492
url https://hdl.handle.net/11441/105492
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869415958870753280
score 15,300724