Mechanical characterisation and biomechanical and biological behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy dental implants

The objective of the study is to characterise the mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr binary alloy dental implants and to describe their biomechanical behaviour as well as their osseointegration capacity compared with the conventional Ti-6Al-4V (TAV) alloy implants. The mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Brizuela Velasco, Aritza, Pérez Pevida, Esteban, Jiménez Garrudo, Antonio, Gil Mur, Francisco Javier|||0000-0002-6824-1412, Manero Planella, José María|||0000-0002-1673-4389, Punset Fuste, Miquel|||0000-0002-1904-8667, Chávarri Prado, David, Diéguez Pereira, Markel, Monticelli, Francesca
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2017
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositório:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/112174
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/112174
https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2785863
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Dental implants
Implants dentals
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria biomèdica
Descrição
Resumo:The objective of the study is to characterise the mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr binary alloy dental implants and to describe their biomechanical behaviour as well as their osseointegration capacity compared with the conventional Ti-6Al-4V (TAV) alloy implants. The mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr binary alloy were characterised using Roxolid© implants (Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) via ultrasound. Their biomechanical behaviour was described via finite element analysis. Their osseointegration capacity was compared via an in vivo study performed on 12 adult rabbits. Young’s modulus of the Roxolid© implant was around 103¿GPa, and the Poisson coefficient was around 0.33. There were no significant differences in terms of Von Mises stress values at the implant and bone level between both alloys. Regarding deformation, the highest value was observed for Ti-15Zr implant, and the lowest value was observed for the cortical bone surrounding TAV implant, with no deformation differences at the bone level between both alloys. Histological analysis of the implants inserted in rabbits demonstrated higher BIC percentage for Ti-15Zr implants at 3 and 6 weeks. Ti-15Zr alloy showed elastic properties and biomechanical behaviours similar to TAV alloy, although Ti-15Zr implant had a greater BIC percentage after 3 and 6 weeks of osseointegration.