Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters

This study aimed to compare the one-repetition maximum (1RM) and the velocity outcomes obtained against the same absolute and relative (%1RM) loads between the flat and arched bench press (BP) variants. Eleven competitive male powerlifters were evaluated in one session with the flat BP (natural lumbar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: García Ramos, Amador, Pérez Castilla, Alejandro, Villar Macias, Francisco J., Latorre Román, Pedro A., Párraga Montilla, Juan A., García Pinillos, Felipe
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Jaén
Repositorio:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
OAI Identifier:oai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/4009
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1544662
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526366/
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/4009
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Linear position transducer
powerlifting
maximal strength
velocity-based resistance training
id ES_a7dc84140f2bcf89cb9767e46a8b7575
oai_identifier_str oai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/4009
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerliftersGarcía Ramos, AmadorPérez Castilla, AlejandroVillar Macias, Francisco J.Latorre Román, Pedro A.Párraga Montilla, Juan A.García Pinillos, FelipeLinear position transducerpowerliftingmaximal strengthvelocity-based resistance trainingThis study aimed to compare the one-repetition maximum (1RM) and the velocity outcomes obtained against the same absolute and relative (%1RM) loads between the flat and arched bench press (BP) variants. Eleven competitive male powerlifters were evaluated in one session with the flat BP (natural lumbar arch and moderate scapular retraction) and in another session with the arched BP (pronounced lumbar arch and scapular retraction). An incremental loading test was used to determine the 1RM as well as the barbell’s velocity against the different external loads. The main findings revealed that the 1RM did not significantly differ between the flat (115.9 ± 17.9 kg) and arched (115.7 ± 18.4 kg) BP variants (p = 0.942, effect size = 0.01), while there were no sig- nificant differences between BP variants either for the velocity outcomes obtained against the individual loads nor for the velo- cities associated with each %1RM (p > 0.05). These results suggest that competitive powerlifters do not necessarily present their higher 1RM performance using the arched BP variant. Finally, both BP variants could be used interchangeably when using movement velocity for testing upper-body strength as well as for prescribing the load during velocity-based resistance training routines.Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group202520252021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1544662https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526366/https://hdl.handle.net/10953/4009reponame:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaéninstname:Universidad de JaénInglésSports biomechanics (2021). 20 (3), 261-273info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/40092026-06-24T12:41:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
title Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
spellingShingle Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
García Ramos, Amador
Linear position transducer
powerlifting
maximal strength
velocity-based resistance training
title_short Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
title_full Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
title_fullStr Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
title_sort Differences in the one-repetition maximum and load-velocity profile between the flat and arched bench press in competitive powerlifters
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv García Ramos, Amador
Pérez Castilla, Alejandro
Villar Macias, Francisco J.
Latorre Román, Pedro A.
Párraga Montilla, Juan A.
García Pinillos, Felipe
author García Ramos, Amador
author_facet García Ramos, Amador
Pérez Castilla, Alejandro
Villar Macias, Francisco J.
Latorre Román, Pedro A.
Párraga Montilla, Juan A.
García Pinillos, Felipe
author_role author
author2 Pérez Castilla, Alejandro
Villar Macias, Francisco J.
Latorre Román, Pedro A.
Párraga Montilla, Juan A.
García Pinillos, Felipe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Linear position transducer
powerlifting
maximal strength
velocity-based resistance training
topic Linear position transducer
powerlifting
maximal strength
velocity-based resistance training
description This study aimed to compare the one-repetition maximum (1RM) and the velocity outcomes obtained against the same absolute and relative (%1RM) loads between the flat and arched bench press (BP) variants. Eleven competitive male powerlifters were evaluated in one session with the flat BP (natural lumbar arch and moderate scapular retraction) and in another session with the arched BP (pronounced lumbar arch and scapular retraction). An incremental loading test was used to determine the 1RM as well as the barbell’s velocity against the different external loads. The main findings revealed that the 1RM did not significantly differ between the flat (115.9 ± 17.9 kg) and arched (115.7 ± 18.4 kg) BP variants (p = 0.942, effect size = 0.01), while there were no sig- nificant differences between BP variants either for the velocity outcomes obtained against the individual loads nor for the velo- cities associated with each %1RM (p > 0.05). These results suggest that competitive powerlifters do not necessarily present their higher 1RM performance using the arched BP variant. Finally, both BP variants could be used interchangeably when using movement velocity for testing upper-body strength as well as for prescribing the load during velocity-based resistance training routines.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1544662
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526366/
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/4009
url https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1544662
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30526366/
https://hdl.handle.net/10953/4009
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Sports biomechanics (2021). 20 (3), 261-273
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
instname:Universidad de Jaén
instname_str Universidad de Jaén
reponame_str RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
collection RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869415813179506688
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia