How does the slope gradient affect spatiotemporal parameters during running? Influence of athletic level and vertical and leg stiffness
Background The current evidence leaves certain questions unanswered, including whether well-trained athletes adapt to different slope gradients in the same way as amateurs, and whether stiffness influences spatiotemporal adaptations during uphill running. Research question This study aimed to determ...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Jaén |
| Repositorio: | RUJA. Repositorio Institucional de la Producción Científica de la Universidad de Jaén |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruja.ujaen.es:10953/4043 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.008 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966636218314528 https://hdl.handle.net/10953/4043 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Endurance runners Kinematics Running uphill Lower-body stiffness |
| Sumario: | Background The current evidence leaves certain questions unanswered, including whether well-trained athletes adapt to different slope gradients in the same way as amateurs, and whether stiffness influences spatiotemporal adaptations during uphill running. Research question This study aimed to determine the effect of different slope gradients (0%–11%) on spatiotemporal gait characteristics during running, taking into account the influence of athletic level, vertical and leg stiffness. Methods Male endurance runners (12 amateurs, 10 highly-trained) performed a running test on a motorized treadmill. The running velocity was set at 12 km/h, and participants completed six different running conditions (0, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11% gradients). Spatiotemporal parameters were measured using the OptoGait system. Vertical (Kvert) and leg (Kleg) stiffness were calculated according to the sine-wave method. Results A 2 (amateur; highly-trained) × 6 (running conditions) ANOVA found no significant between-group differences in spatiotemporal parameters at any gradient (P ≥ 0.05); however, significant Kvert and Kleg differences (P < 0.05) were found within both groups with increasing gradients. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that Kleg was strongly associated with contact time (R2 = 0.797, P < 0.001), whereas Kvert was associated with spatiotemporal adaptations to different slope gradients (R2 = 0.547, P = 0.002). Significance An increased slope gradient (0–11%) at a given running velocity (12 km.h−1) caused spatiotemporal adaptations (i.e., increased CT and SF and decreased FT, SL and SA) regardless of the athletic level of the runner, although a non-significant trend differentiated the adaptations between the amateur and highly-trained groups. The results also indicated that leg stiffness plays a key role in the characteristics of spatiotemporal gait during level running, whereas vertical stiffness is strongly associated with spatiotemporal adaptations when running uphill. |
|---|