Charlie Chaplin & Buster Keaton comic anthiero extremes during the 1920S

The essay is a revisionist look at James Agee’s famous article “Comedy’s Greatest Era” –keying on Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin– ‘the comedy auteurs’ of the 1920s. However, while Chaplin was the giant of the era, period literature showcases that Keaton was a popular but more cult-like figure. (S...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Gehring, Wes
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Repositorio:RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riucv.ucv.es:20.500.12466/361
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/361
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Heroes
Comedy
Existentialism
Héroes
Comedia
Existencialismo
6203.01 Cinematografía
Descrição
Resumo:The essay is a revisionist look at James Agee’s famous article “Comedy’s Greatest Era” –keying on Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin– ‘the comedy auteurs’ of the 1920s. However, while Chaplin was the giant of the era, period literature showcases that Keaton was a popular but more cult-like figure. (See my forthcoming book: Buster Keaton in his own time, McFarland Press). However, Keaton is now considered on a par with Chaplin. While the inspired comedy of Chaplin will be forever timeless, Keaton now seems to speak to today. At least during this decade, Chaplin embraces the emotional humanistic heart of a Dickens past, while Keaton ponders the cerebral existentialism of a Camus, or Beckett. Life is messy but for Chaplin, art is where you get it right... if for only 90 minutes. Keaton’s message/reminder is that life is chaos.... a rough cut “movie” that just stops. Or, as Kafka observed, “The meaning of life is that it ends”. Truly two perspectives to ponder.