Sobre monedas de época almohade: I. El dinar del cadí 'Iyad que nunca existió. II. Cuándo se acuñaron las primeras monedas almohades y la cuestión de la licitud de acuñar moneda
[EN] This article is structured in two parts. In the first part, the reading made by F. Codera (and followed by later scholars) of a dinar minted in Ceuta in 543H. is corrected. This correction proves that the dinar is an anti-Almohad coin. In the second part, following the pioneering study by S. Fo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2006 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/9828 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9828 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Islamic coins Minting Legal doctrine Ibn Hazm 'Iyad Almorávides Almohads Ayyubids Monedas islámicas Acuñación Doctrina legal Almohades |
| Sumario: | [EN] This article is structured in two parts. In the first part, the reading made by F. Codera (and followed by later scholars) of a dinar minted in Ceuta in 543H. is corrected. This correction proves that the dinar is an anti-Almohad coin. In the second part, following the pioneering study by S. Fontenla, the issue of whether Ibn Tumart minted coins is analyzed. My answer to this question —after discussing the meaning of the «mahdism» of the founder of the Almohad movement— is negative. A related issue is that of the licit character of minting coins, with Ibn Hazm answering in the negative. I discuss to what extent the peculiar form of minting coins under the Almohads could have been influenced by the monetary theories of Ibn Hazm, and also to what extent they influenced both the Almohad caliph al-Mansur and the Ayyubid sultan al-Malik al-Kamil Muhammad. |
|---|