How do we deliver our findings? Analysis of podium presentations at shoulder meetings

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the time structure of oral presentations delivered at three shoulder congresses: shoulder sessions at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Meeting, European Foundation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (E...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Miquel, J., Santana Pérez, Fernando, Barrera, Alberto, Torrens, Carlos
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2018
País:España
Recursos:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositório:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/41703
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/41703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0942-7
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Presentacions gràfiques multimèdia
Comunicació visual
Conference presentations
Shoulder congresses
Time constraints
Video inclusion
Descrição
Resumo:BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the time structure of oral presentations delivered at three shoulder congresses: shoulder sessions at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Meeting, European Foundation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) Congress, and International Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ICSES). METHODS: A total of 160 oral presentations at the 2016 AAOS Annual Meeting, 17th EFORT Congress, and 13th ICSES were included. Podium presentations were categorized by topic, congress, inclusion of video support, and nationality of the speaker. Total time and time dedicated to each section of the presentation (introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusions) were collected for all podium presentations. RESULTS: Approximately 34% of speakers exceeded time constraints. No differences were found in the times that presenters used for the introduction, methods, results, and conclusions sections (p > 0.05). However, when extended introductions were delivered, the results and conclusions sections were shortened (r = - 0.2 and r = - 0.21, respectively). Inclusion of video support tended to result in exceedance of time limits (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: One third of the shoulder surgeons exceeded time constraints in their conference presentations, and no distinctions were found in time allocations for different sections of the presentations. Longer introductions may lead to time restriction in the results and conclusions sections.