Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.

BACKGROUND: The PEARL study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (palbociclib/ET) was not superior to capecitabine in improving progression-free survival in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors, but was better tolerated. This analysis comp...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Kahan, Zsuzsanna, Gil-Gil, Miguel, Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel, Carrasco, Eva, Ciruelos, Eva, Munoz, Montserrat, Bermejo, Begona, Margeli, Mireia, Anton, Antonio, Casas, Maribel, Csoszi, Tibor, Murillo, Laura, Morales, Serafin, Calvo, Lourdes, Lang, Istvan, Alba, Emilio, de la Haba-Rodriguez, Juan, Ramos, Manuel, Lopez, Isabel Alvarez, Gal-Yam, Einav, Garcia-Palomo, Andres, Alvarez, Elena, Gonzalez-Santiago, Santiago, Rodriguez, Cesar A, Servitja, Sonia, Corsaro, Massimo, Rodrigalvarez, Graciela, Zielinski, Christoph, Martin, Miguel
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:INCLIVA
Repositorio:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
OAI Identifier:oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p15912
Acesso em linha:https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/15912
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:CDK4/6 inhibitor
Endocrine therapy
Health-related quality of life
Hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer
Palbociclib
id ES_a5e9c739bde8a113b7986695290993cd
oai_identifier_str oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p15912
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.Kahan, ZsuzsannaGil-Gil, MiguelRuiz-Borrego, ManuelCarrasco, EvaCiruelos, EvaMunoz, MontserratBermejo, BegonaMargeli, MireiaAnton, AntonioCasas, MaribelCsoszi, TiborMurillo, LauraMorales, SerafinCalvo, LourdesLang, IstvanAlba, Emiliode la Haba-Rodriguez, JuanRamos, ManuelLopez, Isabel AlvarezGal-Yam, EinavGarcia-Palomo, AndresAlvarez, ElenaGonzalez-Santiago, SantiagoRodriguez, Cesar AServitja, SoniaCorsaro, MassimoRodrigalvarez, GracielaZielinski, ChristophMartin, MiguelCDK4/6 inhibitorEndocrine therapyHealth-related quality of lifeHormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancerPalbociclibBACKGROUND: The PEARL study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (palbociclib/ET) was not superior to capecitabine in improving progression-free survival in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors, but was better tolerated. This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PEARL quality of life (QoL) population comprised 537 patients, 268 randomised to palbociclib/ET (exemestane or fulvestrant) and 269 to capecitabine. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Changes from the baseline and time to deterioration (TTD) were analysed using linear mixed-effect and stratified Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Questionnaire completion rate was high and similar between treatment arms. Significant differences were observed in the mean change in global health status (GHS)/QoL scores from the baseline to cycle 3 (2.9 for palbociclib/ET vs. -2.1 for capecitabine (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.6; P = 0.007). The median TTD in GHS/QoL was 8.3 months for palbociclib/ET versus 5.3 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = 0.003). Similar improvements for palbociclib/ET were also seen for other scales as physical, role, cognitive, social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting and appetite loss. No differences were observed between the treatment arms in change from the baseline in any item of the EQ-5D-L3 questionnaire as per the overall index score and visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving palbociclib/ET experienced a significant delay in deterioration of GHS/QoL and several functional and symptom scales compared with capecitabine, providing additional evidence that palbociclib/ET is better tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov). EUDRACT STUDY NUMBER: 2013-003170-27.ELSEVIER SCI LTD2021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/15912EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCERISSN: 09598049ISSNe: 18790852reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVAinstname:INCLIVAInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p159122026-06-07T16:35:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
title Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
spellingShingle Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
Kahan, Zsuzsanna
CDK4/6 inhibitor
Endocrine therapy
Health-related quality of life
Hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer
Palbociclib
title_short Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
title_full Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
title_fullStr Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
title_full_unstemmed Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
title_sort Health-related quality of life with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: Patient-reported outcomes in the PEARL study.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kahan, Zsuzsanna
Gil-Gil, Miguel
Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel
Carrasco, Eva
Ciruelos, Eva
Munoz, Montserrat
Bermejo, Begona
Margeli, Mireia
Anton, Antonio
Casas, Maribel
Csoszi, Tibor
Murillo, Laura
Morales, Serafin
Calvo, Lourdes
Lang, Istvan
Alba, Emilio
de la Haba-Rodriguez, Juan
Ramos, Manuel
Lopez, Isabel Alvarez
Gal-Yam, Einav
Garcia-Palomo, Andres
Alvarez, Elena
Gonzalez-Santiago, Santiago
Rodriguez, Cesar A
Servitja, Sonia
Corsaro, Massimo
Rodrigalvarez, Graciela
Zielinski, Christoph
Martin, Miguel
author Kahan, Zsuzsanna
author_facet Kahan, Zsuzsanna
Gil-Gil, Miguel
Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel
Carrasco, Eva
Ciruelos, Eva
Munoz, Montserrat
Bermejo, Begona
Margeli, Mireia
Anton, Antonio
Casas, Maribel
Csoszi, Tibor
Murillo, Laura
Morales, Serafin
Calvo, Lourdes
Lang, Istvan
Alba, Emilio
de la Haba-Rodriguez, Juan
Ramos, Manuel
Lopez, Isabel Alvarez
Gal-Yam, Einav
Garcia-Palomo, Andres
Alvarez, Elena
Gonzalez-Santiago, Santiago
Rodriguez, Cesar A
Servitja, Sonia
Corsaro, Massimo
Rodrigalvarez, Graciela
Zielinski, Christoph
Martin, Miguel
author_role author
author2 Gil-Gil, Miguel
Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel
Carrasco, Eva
Ciruelos, Eva
Munoz, Montserrat
Bermejo, Begona
Margeli, Mireia
Anton, Antonio
Casas, Maribel
Csoszi, Tibor
Murillo, Laura
Morales, Serafin
Calvo, Lourdes
Lang, Istvan
Alba, Emilio
de la Haba-Rodriguez, Juan
Ramos, Manuel
Lopez, Isabel Alvarez
Gal-Yam, Einav
Garcia-Palomo, Andres
Alvarez, Elena
Gonzalez-Santiago, Santiago
Rodriguez, Cesar A
Servitja, Sonia
Corsaro, Massimo
Rodrigalvarez, Graciela
Zielinski, Christoph
Martin, Miguel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CDK4/6 inhibitor
Endocrine therapy
Health-related quality of life
Hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer
Palbociclib
topic CDK4/6 inhibitor
Endocrine therapy
Health-related quality of life
Hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer
Palbociclib
description BACKGROUND: The PEARL study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (palbociclib/ET) was not superior to capecitabine in improving progression-free survival in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors, but was better tolerated. This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PEARL quality of life (QoL) population comprised 537 patients, 268 randomised to palbociclib/ET (exemestane or fulvestrant) and 269 to capecitabine. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Changes from the baseline and time to deterioration (TTD) were analysed using linear mixed-effect and stratified Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: Questionnaire completion rate was high and similar between treatment arms. Significant differences were observed in the mean change in global health status (GHS)/QoL scores from the baseline to cycle 3 (2.9 for palbociclib/ET vs. -2.1 for capecitabine (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-8.6; P = 0.007). The median TTD in GHS/QoL was 8.3 months for palbociclib/ET versus 5.3 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = 0.003). Similar improvements for palbociclib/ET were also seen for other scales as physical, role, cognitive, social functioning, fatigue, nausea/vomiting and appetite loss. No differences were observed between the treatment arms in change from the baseline in any item of the EQ-5D-L3 questionnaire as per the overall index score and visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving palbociclib/ET experienced a significant delay in deterioration of GHS/QoL and several functional and symptom scales compared with capecitabine, providing additional evidence that palbociclib/ET is better tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov). EUDRACT STUDY NUMBER: 2013-003170-27.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/15912
url https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/15912
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER SCI LTD
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN: 09598049
ISSNe: 18790852
reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
instname:INCLIVA
instname_str INCLIVA
reponame_str r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
collection r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869415654826704896
score 15,198674