Evaluating the Screening Capability of the SarQoL Questionnaire in Sarcopenic Obesity: A Comparison Study Between Spanish and Belgian Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the potential of the SarQoL questionnaire as a screening tool for sarcopenic obesity by comparing its effectiveness in Spanish and Belgian community-dwelling older people. This research seeks to address the primary question of whether the SarQoL can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Diago-Galmés, A, Guillamón-Escudero, C, Tenías-Burillo, JM, Soriano, JM, Fernandez-Garrido, J
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:r-fisabio___::e63483897da422d416a64c1e1aef8073
Acceso en línea:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/20614
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:sarcopenic obesity
older adults
SarQoL
quality of life
screening method
Descripción
Sumario:Background/Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the potential of the SarQoL questionnaire as a screening tool for sarcopenic obesity by comparing its effectiveness in Spanish and Belgian community-dwelling older people. This research seeks to address the primary question of whether the SarQoL can reliably differentiate quality of life impacts between these groups. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving community-dwelling older adults from Valencia (Spain) and Li & egrave;ge (Belgium). Participants were assessed using the SarQoL questionnaire, which measures health-related quality of life specifically for sarcopenia, and a sarcopenic obesity diagnostic method based on a combination of the EWGSOP2 criteria for sarcopenia and of body mass index for obesity. The sample included diverse demographic and clinical characteristics to ensure comprehensive analysis. Statistical methods were employed to compare the outcomes between the two populations. Results: The study highlighted a significant relationship between quality-of-life scores and the prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in the Spanish and Belgian populations. The SarQoL questionnaire effectively identified lower quality of life in individuals with sarcopenic obesity, demonstrating its potential as a reliable screening tool across different populations. In conclusion, the SarQoL questionnaire proved to be an effective tool for evaluating quality of life and for screening individuals with sarcopenic obesity. Conclusions: Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies to determine the SarQoL questionnaire's predictive value and investigate interventions to alleviate the adverse effects of sarcopenic obesity. Our results highlight the critical need to include quality of life assessments in managing sarcopenic obesity, advocating for a comprehensive approach to patient care.