Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring

Advancements have been made in the use of DNA-based methods for the detection of single species. However, the routine application of DNA-based methods to monitor whole communities using a metabarcoding approach and derive ecosystem status continues to be limited.We undertook a structured experiment...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Jones, J. Iwan, Arnold, Amanda, Buchner, Dominik, Murphy, John F., Childress, Jasmine N., Beja, Pedro, Altermatt, Florian, Meissner, Kristian, Adams, Ian, Anderson, Meri, Borrell Pichs, Yaisel Juan|||0000-0003-2840-4384, Briscoe, Andrew G., Bruce, Kat, Chaves, Cátia, Conyers, Chris, Deiner, Kristy, Elbrecht, Vasco, Fueyo, Álvaro, Goodall, Tim, Granero-Castro, Javier, Hartmann-Fatu, Cristina, Jones, Eleanor, Mächler, Elvira, Martins, Filipa M. S., McGreig, Sam, Pereira-da-Conceicoa, Lyndall, Pretty, James L., Read, Daniel S., Price, Ben, Leese, Florian, Blackman, Rosetta C.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
Repositorio:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:digibuo.uniovi.es:10651/81726
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10651/81726
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.70093
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: Implications for its use in biomonitoring
id ES_a4ed867f77b92daa359e15c33ffaecbb
oai_identifier_str oai:digibuo.uniovi.es:10651/81726
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoringJones, J. IwanArnold, AmandaBuchner, DominikMurphy, John F.Childress, Jasmine N.Beja, PedroAltermatt, FlorianMeissner, KristianAdams, IanAnderson, MeriBorrell Pichs, Yaisel Juan|||0000-0003-2840-4384Briscoe, Andrew G.Bruce, KatChaves, CátiaConyers, ChrisDeiner, KristyElbrecht, VascoFueyo, ÁlvaroGoodall, TimGranero-Castro, JavierHartmann-Fatu, CristinaJones, EleanorMächler, ElviraMartins, Filipa M. S.McGreig, SamPereira-da-Conceicoa, LyndallPretty, James L.Read, Daniel S.Price, BenLeese, FlorianBlackman, Rosetta C.Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: Implications for its use in biomonitoringAdvancements have been made in the use of DNA-based methods for the detection of single species. However, the routine application of DNA-based methods to monitor whole communities using a metabarcoding approach and derive ecosystem status continues to be limited.We undertook a structured experiment to assess factors influencing the precision and accuracy of molecular methods for freshwater macroinvertebrate community assessment. Macroinvertebrates were sorted, identified and counted from kick-net samples using standard morphometric protocols, then reconstituted. These bulk specimen samples were then homogenised. From each bulk sample, aliquots of the homogenate were distributed among seven laboratories across Europe for DNA extraction, PCR amplification, library preparation and sequencing. Additionally, each laboratory was provided with a DNA extract from the bulk homogenate to allow for amplification through to sequencing, in order to assess the influence of DNA extraction. Hierarchical nested analyses were used to identify sources of uncertainty in the data and explore factors influencing the returned community and metrics of ecosystem quality. Furthermore, comparison with morphological analysis enabled us to benchmark molecular to traditional processing approaches.Metrics derived by morphological and DNA-based methods differed substantially. The strongest methodological influences on variance in metrics derived from DNA-based methods were attributed to sequencing (read count per sample) and laboratory (strong variation within samples). Furthermore, the performance of the DNA-based method varied among samples, most likely due to differences in the composition of the invertebrate community. Logistic regression indicated that detectability did not vary among taxa, but that taxa occurring in low abundance (less than five individuals in our samples) were more likely to be missed via metabarcoding.Our findings highlight sources of uncertainty influencing DNA-based methods and, particularly, the variability of results generated from individual laboratories. Our findings underline the need for clear guidelines, standardisation and quality assurance schemes.This paper is a result of the COST Action CA15219 'Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment of aquatic ecosystems in Europe' (DNAqua-Net), funded by the European Union. KD and VE were supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 852621).20252025-07-02journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10651/81726https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.70093reponame:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedoinstname:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)InglésengEuropean Commission http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 852621open accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digibuo.uniovi.es:10651/817262026-06-07T06:38:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
title Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
spellingShingle Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
Jones, J. Iwan
Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: Implications for its use in biomonitoring
title_short Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
title_full Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
title_fullStr Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
title_full_unstemmed Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
title_sort Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: implications for its use in biomonitoring
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jones, J. Iwan
Arnold, Amanda
Buchner, Dominik
Murphy, John F.
Childress, Jasmine N.
Beja, Pedro
Altermatt, Florian
Meissner, Kristian
Adams, Ian
Anderson, Meri
Borrell Pichs, Yaisel Juan|||0000-0003-2840-4384
Briscoe, Andrew G.
Bruce, Kat
Chaves, Cátia
Conyers, Chris
Deiner, Kristy
Elbrecht, Vasco
Fueyo, Álvaro
Goodall, Tim
Granero-Castro, Javier
Hartmann-Fatu, Cristina
Jones, Eleanor
Mächler, Elvira
Martins, Filipa M. S.
McGreig, Sam
Pereira-da-Conceicoa, Lyndall
Pretty, James L.
Read, Daniel S.
Price, Ben
Leese, Florian
Blackman, Rosetta C.
author Jones, J. Iwan
author_facet Jones, J. Iwan
Arnold, Amanda
Buchner, Dominik
Murphy, John F.
Childress, Jasmine N.
Beja, Pedro
Altermatt, Florian
Meissner, Kristian
Adams, Ian
Anderson, Meri
Borrell Pichs, Yaisel Juan|||0000-0003-2840-4384
Briscoe, Andrew G.
Bruce, Kat
Chaves, Cátia
Conyers, Chris
Deiner, Kristy
Elbrecht, Vasco
Fueyo, Álvaro
Goodall, Tim
Granero-Castro, Javier
Hartmann-Fatu, Cristina
Jones, Eleanor
Mächler, Elvira
Martins, Filipa M. S.
McGreig, Sam
Pereira-da-Conceicoa, Lyndall
Pretty, James L.
Read, Daniel S.
Price, Ben
Leese, Florian
Blackman, Rosetta C.
author_role author
author2 Arnold, Amanda
Buchner, Dominik
Murphy, John F.
Childress, Jasmine N.
Beja, Pedro
Altermatt, Florian
Meissner, Kristian
Adams, Ian
Anderson, Meri
Borrell Pichs, Yaisel Juan|||0000-0003-2840-4384
Briscoe, Andrew G.
Bruce, Kat
Chaves, Cátia
Conyers, Chris
Deiner, Kristy
Elbrecht, Vasco
Fueyo, Álvaro
Goodall, Tim
Granero-Castro, Javier
Hartmann-Fatu, Cristina
Jones, Eleanor
Mächler, Elvira
Martins, Filipa M. S.
McGreig, Sam
Pereira-da-Conceicoa, Lyndall
Pretty, James L.
Read, Daniel S.
Price, Ben
Leese, Florian
Blackman, Rosetta C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: Implications for its use in biomonitoring
topic Sources of uncertainty in DNA metabarcoding of whole communities: Implications for its use in biomonitoring
description Advancements have been made in the use of DNA-based methods for the detection of single species. However, the routine application of DNA-based methods to monitor whole communities using a metabarcoding approach and derive ecosystem status continues to be limited.We undertook a structured experiment to assess factors influencing the precision and accuracy of molecular methods for freshwater macroinvertebrate community assessment. Macroinvertebrates were sorted, identified and counted from kick-net samples using standard morphometric protocols, then reconstituted. These bulk specimen samples were then homogenised. From each bulk sample, aliquots of the homogenate were distributed among seven laboratories across Europe for DNA extraction, PCR amplification, library preparation and sequencing. Additionally, each laboratory was provided with a DNA extract from the bulk homogenate to allow for amplification through to sequencing, in order to assess the influence of DNA extraction. Hierarchical nested analyses were used to identify sources of uncertainty in the data and explore factors influencing the returned community and metrics of ecosystem quality. Furthermore, comparison with morphological analysis enabled us to benchmark molecular to traditional processing approaches.Metrics derived by morphological and DNA-based methods differed substantially. The strongest methodological influences on variance in metrics derived from DNA-based methods were attributed to sequencing (read count per sample) and laboratory (strong variation within samples). Furthermore, the performance of the DNA-based method varied among samples, most likely due to differences in the composition of the invertebrate community. Logistic regression indicated that detectability did not vary among taxa, but that taxa occurring in low abundance (less than five individuals in our samples) were more likely to be missed via metabarcoding.Our findings highlight sources of uncertainty influencing DNA-based methods and, particularly, the variability of results generated from individual laboratories. Our findings underline the need for clear guidelines, standardisation and quality assurance schemes.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2025-07-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10651/81726
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.70093
url https://hdl.handle.net/10651/81726
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.70093
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Commission http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780 Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 852621
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
instname:Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
instname_str Universidad de Oviedo (UNIOVI)
reponame_str RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
collection RUO. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Oviedo
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869415554764242944
score 15,81155