Vitamin D Status in Pediatric and Young Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Are the New Recommendations Effective?

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, guidelines for vitamin D supplementation have been updated and prophylactic recommended doses have been increased in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of these new recommendations. RESULTS: Two cohorts of pancreatic insuffic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mangas-Sanchez, C, Garriga-Garcia, M, Serrano-Nieto, MJ, Garcia-Romero, R, alvarez-Beltran, M, Crehua-Gaudiza, E, Munoz-Codoceo, R, Suarez-Cortina, L, Vicente-Santamaria, S, Martinez-Costa, C, Diaz-Martin, JJ, Bousono-Garcia, C, Gonzalez-Jimenez, D
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:INCLIVA
Repositorio:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
OAI Identifier:oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p16386
Acceso en línea:https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16386
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:cystic fibrosis
multicenter study
vitamin D
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In recent years, guidelines for vitamin D supplementation have been updated and prophylactic recommended doses have been increased in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of these new recommendations. RESULTS: Two cohorts of pancreatic insufficient CF patients were compared before (cohort 1: 179 patients) and after (cohort 2: 71 patients) American CF Foundation and European CF Society recommendations were published. Cohort 2 patients received higher Vitamin D doses: 1509 (1306-1711 95% CI) vs 1084 (983-1184 95% CI) IU/Day (p < 0.001), had higher 25 OH vitamin D levels: 30.6 (27.9-33.26 95% CI) vs. 27.4 (25.9-28.8 95% CI) ng/mL (p = 0.028), and had a lower prevalence of insufficient vitamin D levels (<30 ng/mL): 48% vs 65% (p = 0.011). Adjusted by confounding factors, patients in cohort 1 had a higher risk of vitamin D insufficiency: OR 2.23 (1.09-4.57 95% CI) (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: After the implementation of new guidelines, CF patients received higher doses of vitamin D and a risk of vitamin D insufficiency decreased. Despite this, almost a third of CF patients still do not reach sufficient serum calcidiol levels.