Efectos sistemáticos en futuros experimentos de polarización del CMB para la detección de las ondas gravitacionales primordiales

ABSTRACT: The B-mode pattern of the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the imprint of the Primordial Gravitational Waves (PGW) during the inflation period. Nowadays, several experiments have been dedicated to observe the B-mode polarization signal but it has not been discovered...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Zhang, Jun-Yan
Format: master thesis
Publication Date:2021
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Cantabria (UC)
Repository:UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/22442
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10902/22442
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Cosmic Microwave Background
Polarization
B-mode
Instrumentation
Systematic effects
El Fondo Cósmico de Microondas
Polarización
modos B
Instrumentación
Efectos sistemáticos
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT: The B-mode pattern of the polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the imprint of the Primordial Gravitational Waves (PGW) during the inflation period. Nowadays, several experiments have been dedicated to observe the B-mode polarization signal but it has not been discovered yet. In the future, there will be some new experiments specialized in detecting the CMB polarization, touching the 0.001 limit of the parameter r, the tensor-to-scalar ratio which is an indicator about the strength of PGW. The weak signal from B-mode polarization together with the noises and systematic effects make the detection extremely hard. In this paper, we mainly evaluated the different influences of three relevant systematic effects, polar ization angle mismatch, pointing error and beam calibration imperfection acting on four future experiments: LiteBIRD, PICO, Simons Observatory and CMB Stage-4. We showed that to reach an 1% increment in the uncertainty (error) in the parameter r, the polarization angle should be calibrated within 3’-22’ and the pointing direction should be calibrated within 1’-4’, depending on the experiment. On the other hand, the uncertainties in the beam calibration of the sidelobes affect the error in r in a wide range from 0.05% to 200% for the different experiments.