Clinical Outcomes of Golimumab as First, Second or Third Anti-TNF Agent in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Golimumab efficacy data in ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor a (TNF)-naive patients. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term and long-term efficacy of golimumab used as first, second, or third anti-TNF in UC in a real-life clinical setting. Meth...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Taxonera, C, Rodriguez, C, Bertoletti, F, Menchen, L, Arribas, J, Sierra, M, Arias, L, Martinez-Montiel, P, Juan, A, Iglesias, E, Algaba, A, Mancenido, N, Rivero, M, Barreiro-de Acosta, M, Lopez-Serrano, P, Arguelles-Arias, F, Gutierrez, A, Busquets, D, Gisbert, JP, Olivares, D, Calvo, M, Alba, C
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2017
País:España
Recursos:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositório:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p14182
Acesso em linha:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=14182
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:ulcerative colitis
golimumab
adalimumab
infliximab
secondary loss of response
dose escalation
colectomy
anti-TNF
Descrição
Resumo:Background: Golimumab efficacy data in ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor a (TNF)-naive patients. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term and long-term efficacy of golimumab used as first, second, or third anti-TNF in UC in a real-life clinical setting. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with golimumab. The primary efficacy endpoints were short-term partial Mayo score response, long-term golimumab failure-free survival, and colectomy-free survival. Results: In 142 patients with UC, golimumab was administered as first (40%), second (23%), or third anti-TNF (37%). Ninety-two patients (65%, 95% confidence interval 56.6-73) achieved short-term clinical response. Forty-five patients (32%, 95% confidence interval 23.7-39.7) achieved clinical remission. Response rates for golimumab were 75% as first anti-TNF, 70% as second anti-TNF (ns versus first anti-TNF), and 50% as third anti-TNF (P = 0.007 versus first anti-TNF). After 12 months median follow-up (interquartile range 6-18), 60 patients (42%, 95% confidence interval 34-51) had golimumab failure, and 15 patients (11%) needed colectomy. Thirty-one patients (22%) needed golimumab dose escalation, and 71% of these regained response after escalation. Starting maintenance with 100 mg golimumab doses and short-term nonresponse were independent predictors of golimumab failure. Conclusions: In this real-life cohort of patients with UC, golimumab therapy was effective for inducing and maintaining clinical response. Although anti-TNF-naive patients had better outcomes, golimumab was also effective in anti-TNF-experienced patients. Only the patients given golimumab after previous failure of 2 anti-TNF agents had significantly worse outcomes. Golimumab dose escalation was beneficial and safe.