Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC)
Copper-tin bronzes can be obtained through different techniques (i.e. natural alloying, co-smelting, cementation, co-melting and recycling). This paper presents a methodology and theoretical framework to contextually explain the logic behind the selection of bronze alloying techniques in different c...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| Repositorio: | Repositori Obert UdL |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/467936 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/467936 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Co-smelting Cementation Co-melting Recycling Technological choices Bronze slag |
| id |
ES_a297df98c7c899db75944d249ba6db21 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/467936 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC)Montes-Landa, JuliaPons, EnriquetaRovira Hortalà, M. CarmeMoya, AndreuAlonso, NatàliaMartinon-Torres, MarcosCo-smeltingCementationCo-meltingRecyclingTechnological choicesBronze slagCopper-tin bronzes can be obtained through different techniques (i.e. natural alloying, co-smelting, cementation, co-melting and recycling). This paper presents a methodology and theoretical framework to contextually explain the logic behind the selection of bronze alloying techniques in different contexts, avoiding deterministic, aprioristic and linear narratives. To do so, we selected Northeast Iberia as a case study and present comparative results of slag and slagged technical ceramics from four sites (Minferri, Vilars, Mas Castellar and Ullastret) dated between 2100-200BC. Materials were analysed using pXRF, OM, SEM-EDS, and ICP-MS to characterise technological choices through time. Patterns of choice are considered in relation to the technical affordances of each alloying technique and contextualised within the relevant environmental and socioeconomic parameters. The results show that bronze-making technique choices were primarily dependent on (1) the (in)stability of raw material procurement networks, and (2) the existent selective pressures on performance characteristics for which each technique offered different trade-offs. Discrete combinations of these two variables can explain instances of different techniques co-existing (e.g. Minferri, Mas Castellar, and Ullastret) and cases of commitment to a single one (e.g. Vilars). This is the first diachronic study of bronze alloying practices investigated through direct analyses of bronze-making residues for a given area. The analytical framework employed and the derived behavioural rules can be applied to other case studies to collectively build a multi-path history of bronze alloying development. This will be fundamental to understand the link between bronze alloying technique selection and social change, to better contextualise metal finds within their production and exchange networks, and to requestion existing models of bronze production organisation and technological diffusion across the world.JML would like to thank the Cambridge Trust and the Arts and Humanities Research Council-Departmental Training partnership (2113448) for jointly funding her PhD, on which this paper is based. She is also grateful to Trinity College (University of Cambridge) for funding the costs associated to travelling to Pontós to collect data. Further funds to support other research trips to collect samples were obtained from the University Fieldwork Fund. The authors are also very grateful to the Historical Metallurgy Society for funding part of the isotopic analyses here presented. MMT's contribution to the write-up of this research was supported by funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 101021480, Project REVERSEACTION). The laboratory analyses at the University of Cambridge were made possible by a grant from UKRI Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) Capability for Collections (CapCo) Fund for the Cambridge Heritage Science Hub (CHERISH) Initiative (AH/V011685/1).Elsevier2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/467936reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)InglésReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206Journal of Archaeological Science, 2025, vol. 178, núm. 106206, p. 1-21info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101021480cc-by (c) The Authors, 2025Attribution 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/4679362026-06-24T12:42:17Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| title |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| spellingShingle |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) Montes-Landa, Julia Co-smelting Cementation Co-melting Recycling Technological choices Bronze slag |
| title_short |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| title_full |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| title_fullStr |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| title_sort |
Towards a new history of bronze making: Explaining the selection of tin bronze alloying techniques across prehistoric N.E. Iberia (2100-200BC) |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Montes-Landa, Julia Pons, Enriqueta Rovira Hortalà, M. Carme Moya, Andreu Alonso, Natàlia Martinon-Torres, Marcos |
| author |
Montes-Landa, Julia |
| author_facet |
Montes-Landa, Julia Pons, Enriqueta Rovira Hortalà, M. Carme Moya, Andreu Alonso, Natàlia Martinon-Torres, Marcos |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pons, Enriqueta Rovira Hortalà, M. Carme Moya, Andreu Alonso, Natàlia Martinon-Torres, Marcos |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Co-smelting Cementation Co-melting Recycling Technological choices Bronze slag |
| topic |
Co-smelting Cementation Co-melting Recycling Technological choices Bronze slag |
| description |
Copper-tin bronzes can be obtained through different techniques (i.e. natural alloying, co-smelting, cementation, co-melting and recycling). This paper presents a methodology and theoretical framework to contextually explain the logic behind the selection of bronze alloying techniques in different contexts, avoiding deterministic, aprioristic and linear narratives. To do so, we selected Northeast Iberia as a case study and present comparative results of slag and slagged technical ceramics from four sites (Minferri, Vilars, Mas Castellar and Ullastret) dated between 2100-200BC. Materials were analysed using pXRF, OM, SEM-EDS, and ICP-MS to characterise technological choices through time. Patterns of choice are considered in relation to the technical affordances of each alloying technique and contextualised within the relevant environmental and socioeconomic parameters. The results show that bronze-making technique choices were primarily dependent on (1) the (in)stability of raw material procurement networks, and (2) the existent selective pressures on performance characteristics for which each technique offered different trade-offs. Discrete combinations of these two variables can explain instances of different techniques co-existing (e.g. Minferri, Mas Castellar, and Ullastret) and cases of commitment to a single one (e.g. Vilars). This is the first diachronic study of bronze alloying practices investigated through direct analyses of bronze-making residues for a given area. The analytical framework employed and the derived behavioural rules can be applied to other case studies to collectively build a multi-path history of bronze alloying development. This will be fundamental to understand the link between bronze alloying technique selection and social change, to better contextualise metal finds within their production and exchange networks, and to requestion existing models of bronze production organisation and technological diffusion across the world. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/467936 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/467936 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2025.106206 Journal of Archaeological Science, 2025, vol. 178, núm. 106206, p. 1-21 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101021480 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by (c) The Authors, 2025 Attribution 4.0 International info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by (c) The Authors, 2025 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| instname_str |
Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| reponame_str |
Repositori Obert UdL |
| collection |
Repositori Obert UdL |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869415293092102144 |
| score |
15.811543 |