Humanismo y comentario en la Castilla del siglo XV: Juan de Mena y Alonso de Cartagena
This paper proposes a comparison between two commentaries, the gender par excellence in the Humanism, within the complex context of the evaluation of the fifteenth-century Castilian 'Humanism': Juan de Mena's glosses to his own poem Coronaci6n del Marqués de Santillana (Crowning of th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2011 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de La Rioja (UR) |
| Repositorio: | RIUR. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Rioja |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.dialnet.es:doc/5c13b270c8914b6ed377dc74 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://investigacion.unirioja.es/documentos/5c13b270c8914b6ed377dc74 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | This paper proposes a comparison between two commentaries, the gender par excellence in the Humanism, within the complex context of the evaluation of the fifteenth-century Castilian 'Humanism': Juan de Mena's glosses to his own poem Coronaci6n del Marqués de Santillana (Crowning of the Marquis of Santillana, 1438-1439) and Alonso de Cartagena's glosses to his own translation of several passages from Seneca's Tragedies (ca. 1431). From this analysis of several glosses devoted to mythological characters, the paper holds the view that Cartagena's 'professional' and literal text is a better precedent to the later Humanism that Mena's allegorical and scholar commentary. |
|---|