Debating Syria in the Security Council: the discursive processes of legitimisation and delegitimisation of actors involved in the syrian war
The dynamics of the Syrian war have been surrounded by discursive moves of delegitimisation and legitimisation of the parties involved – above all, the Syrian government. Here, on the one hand, Western countries such as France, the United Kingdom and the United States have discursively attempted to...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/114968 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/114968 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Syria United Nations War on Terror Sovereignty United Nations Security Council Legitimacy Relaciones internacionales 5901 Relaciones Internacionales 5901.05 Problemas de las Relaciones Internacionales |
| Sumario: | The dynamics of the Syrian war have been surrounded by discursive moves of delegitimisation and legitimisation of the parties involved – above all, the Syrian government. Here, on the one hand, Western countries such as France, the United Kingdom and the United States have discursively attempted to delegitimise the Syrian government and its position within the international community. On the other hand, Syria, Russia and China have discursively rejected these processes and discursively reaffirmed the Syrian government’s legitimacy as sovereign – understanding sovereignty as the nature of a legitimate government. These opposite positions gave rise to discursive clashes in the United Nations Security Council. |
|---|