Nanoflowers versus magnetosomes: comparison between two promising candidates for magnetic hyperthermia therapy

Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia mediated by iron oxide nanoparticles is one of the mostpromising therapies for cancer treatment. Among the different candidates, magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles have revealed to be some of the most promising candidates due to both their performance andtheir biocompa...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Jefremovas, Elizabeth M., Gandarias, Lucía, Rodrigo, Irati, Marcano, Lourdes, Gruttner, Cordula, García, José Ángel, Garayo Urabayen, Eneko, Orue, Iñaki, García-Prieto, Ana, Muela, Alicia, Fernández-Gubieda, María Luisa, Alonso Masa, Javier, Fernández Barquín, Luis
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Pública de Navarra
Repositorio:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
OAI Identifier:oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/41661
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2454/41661
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Hyperthermia
Magnetic properties
Nanoparticles
X-ray diffraction
Descrição
Resumo:Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia mediated by iron oxide nanoparticles is one of the mostpromising therapies for cancer treatment. Among the different candidates, magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles have revealed to be some of the most promising candidates due to both their performance andtheir biocompatibility. Nonetheless, up to date, the literature comparing the heating efficiency of magnetiteand maghemite nanoparticles of similar size is scarce. To fill this gap, here we provide a comparison between commercial Synomag Nanoflowers (pure maghemite) and bacterial magnetosomes (pure magnetite)synthesized by the magnetotactic bacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldenseof〈D〉 ≈40–45 nm. Bothtypes of nanoparticles exhibit a high degree of crystallinity and an excellent degree of chemical purity andstability. The structural and magnetic properties in both nanoparticle ensembles have been studied by meansof X–Ray Diffraction, Transmission Electron Microscopy, X–Ray Absorption Spectroscopy, and SQUIDmagnetometry. The heating efficiency has been analyzed in both systems using AC magnetometry at severalfield amplitudes (0–88 mT) and frequencies (130, 300, and 530 kHz).