Round-robin testing for LMO2 and MYC as immunohistochemical markers to screen MYC rearrangements in aggressive large B-cell lymphoma
Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R), in addition to BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements by genetic techniques, main...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/59740 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/59740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03584-9 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Large B-cell lymphoma Lymphomas MYC LMO2 FISH |
| Sumario: | Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (aLBCL) include a heterogeneous group of lymphomas with diverse biological features. One of the approaches to the diagnosis of aLBCL is based on the identification of MYC rearrangements (MYC-R), in addition to BCL2 and BCL6 rearrangements by genetic techniques, mainly fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Because of the low incidence of MYC-R, the identification of useful immunohistochemistry markers to select cases for MYC FISH testing may be useful in daily practice. In a previous work, we identified a strong association between the profile CD10 positive/LMO2 negative expression and the presence of MYC-R in aLBCL and obtained good intralaboratory reproducibility. In this study, we wanted to evaluate external reproducibility. To evaluate whether LMO2 can be a reproducible marker between observers 50 aLBCL cases were circulated among 7 hematopathologists of 5 hospitals. Fleiss' kappa index for LMO2 and MYC were 0.87 and 0.70, respectively, indicating high agreement between observers. In addition, during 2021-2022, the enrolled centers included LMO2 in their diagnostic panels to evaluate prospectively the utility of the marker, and 213 cases were analyzed. Comparing LMO2 with MYC, the group of CD10 positive cases showed higher specificity (86% vs 79%), positive predictive value (66% vs 58%), likelihood positive value (5.47 vs 3.78), and accuracy (83% vs 79%), whereas the negative predictive values remained similar (90% vs 91%). These findings place LMO2 as a useful and reproducible marker to screen MYC-R in aLBCL. |
|---|