A comparative analysis of aerosol optical coefficients and their associated errors retrieved from pure-rotational and vibro-rotational raman lidar signals
This paper aims to quantify the improvement obtained with a purely rotational Raman (PRR) channel over a vibro-rotational Raman (VRR) channel, used in an aerosol lidar with elastic and Raman channels, in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), effective vertical resolution, and absolute and relative u...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/349390 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/349390 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21041277 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Atmospheric aerosols Optical radar Raman lidar Pure rotational lines Vibro-rotational lines Theory Experiment Daytime Extinction retrieval Aerosols atmosfèrics Radar òptic Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Radiocomunicació i exploració electromagnètica::Teledetecció |
| Sumario: | This paper aims to quantify the improvement obtained with a purely rotational Raman (PRR) channel over a vibro-rotational Raman (VRR) channel, used in an aerosol lidar with elastic and Raman channels, in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), effective vertical resolution, and absolute and relative uncertainties associated to the retrieved aerosol optical (extinction and backscatter) coefficients. Measurements were made with the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network/Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (EARLINET/UPC) multi-wavelength lidar system enabling a PRR channel at 353.9 nm, together with an already existing VRR (386.7 nm) and an elastic (354.7 nm) channels. Inversions were performed with the EARLINET Single Calculus Chain (SCC). When using PRR instead of VRR, the measurements show a gain in SNR of a factor 2.8 and about 7.6 for 3-h nighttime and daytime measurements, respectively. For 3-h nighttime (daytime) measurements the effective vertical resolution is reduced by 17% (20%), the absolute uncertainty (associated to the extinction) is divided by 2 (10) and the relative uncertainty is divided by 3 (7). During daytime, VRR extinction coefficient is retrieved in a limited height range (<2.2 km) preventing the SCC from finding a suitable calibration range in the search height range. So the advantage of using PRR instead of VRR is particularly evidenced in daytime conditions. For nighttime measurements, decreasing the time resolution from 3 to 1 h has nearly no effect on the relative performances of PRR vs. VRR. |
|---|