Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Aims Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to evaluate the factors that can influence physicians in their choice between a classic and a new a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel, Marco-Vera, Pascual, Alonso-Moreno, Francisco J., Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, Fernando, Gállego-Culleré, Jaime, Honorato-Pérez, Jesús, Suárez Fernández, M. Carmen, Investigadores del estudio ACADEMIC
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Institución:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Repositorio:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/678043
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10486/678043
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.11.004
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Anticoagulants
Atrial fibrillation
Embolisms
Medicina
id ES_9d9f9d105fb2b9554b8a35d94bbaaf2d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/678043
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Percepción de los médicos sobre los factores que influyen en la elección de un dicumarínico o de un nuevo anticoagulante oral en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular
title Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
spellingShingle Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel
Anticoagulants
Atrial fibrillation
Embolisms
Medicina
title_short Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
title_full Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
title_sort Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel
Marco-Vera, Pascual
Alonso-Moreno, Francisco J.
Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, Fernando
Gállego-Culleré, Jaime
Honorato-Pérez, Jesús
Suárez Fernández, M. Carmen
Investigadores del estudio ACADEMIC
author Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel
author_facet Anguita-Sánchez, Manuel
Marco-Vera, Pascual
Alonso-Moreno, Francisco J.
Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, Fernando
Gállego-Culleré, Jaime
Honorato-Pérez, Jesús
Suárez Fernández, M. Carmen
Investigadores del estudio ACADEMIC
author_role author
author2 Marco-Vera, Pascual
Alonso-Moreno, Francisco J.
Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, Fernando
Gállego-Culleré, Jaime
Honorato-Pérez, Jesús
Suárez Fernández, M. Carmen
Investigadores del estudio ACADEMIC
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Medicina
Facultad de Medicina
Instituto de Investigación del Hospital de La Princesa (IP)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Anticoagulants
Atrial fibrillation
Embolisms
Medicina
topic Anticoagulants
Atrial fibrillation
Embolisms
Medicina
description Aims Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to evaluate the factors that can influence physicians in their choice between a classic and a new anticoagulant in these patients. Design Several variables of interest were discussed and analysed using a WorkmatTM methodology. Sites Six regional meetings were held in Spain (East, Catalonia, Andalusia-Extremadura, Madrid, North-east, and North of Spain). Participants Meetings were attended by 39 specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, haematologists, internists, and emergency and Primary Care physicians). Measurements Each participant graded their level of agreement, with a score from 1 to 10, on every analysed variable. Results A new anticoagulant drug was preferred in patients with previous failure of dicoumarin therapy (9.7 ± 0.5), high haemorrhagic risk (8.7 ± 1), prior bleeding (7.8 ± 1.5), and high thrombotic risk (7.7 ± 1.2). Dicoumarins were preferred in cases of severe (1.2 ± 0.4) or moderate (4.2 ± 2.5) kidney failure, good control with dicoumarins (2.3 ± 1.5), cognitive impairment (3.2 ± 3), and low haemorrhagic risk (4.3 ± 3). Age, sex, weight, cost of drug, polymedication, and low thrombotic risk achieved intermediate scores. There were no differences between the different specialists or Spanish regions. Conclusions The presence of a high thrombotic or haemorrhagic risk and the failure of previous dicoumarin therapy lead to choosing a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, while kidney failure, cognitive impairment, good control with dicoumarins, and a low bleeding risk predispose to selecting a classic dicoumarin anticoagulant.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016-10-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10486/678043
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.11.004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10486/678043
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.11.004
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
spa
language_invalid_str_mv Español
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
instname:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
instname_str Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
reponame_str Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
collection Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414758189367296
spelling Perception of physicians on factors that influence the choice of a dicoumarin or a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillationPercepción de los médicos sobre los factores que influyen en la elección de un dicumarínico o de un nuevo anticoagulante oral en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvularAnguita-Sánchez, ManuelMarco-Vera, PascualAlonso-Moreno, Francisco J.Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, FernandoGállego-Culleré, JaimeHonorato-Pérez, JesúsSuárez Fernández, M. CarmenInvestigadores del estudio ACADEMICAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationEmbolismsMedicinaAims Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Our aim was to evaluate the factors that can influence physicians in their choice between a classic and a new anticoagulant in these patients. Design Several variables of interest were discussed and analysed using a WorkmatTM methodology. Sites Six regional meetings were held in Spain (East, Catalonia, Andalusia-Extremadura, Madrid, North-east, and North of Spain). Participants Meetings were attended by 39 specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, haematologists, internists, and emergency and Primary Care physicians). Measurements Each participant graded their level of agreement, with a score from 1 to 10, on every analysed variable. Results A new anticoagulant drug was preferred in patients with previous failure of dicoumarin therapy (9.7 ± 0.5), high haemorrhagic risk (8.7 ± 1), prior bleeding (7.8 ± 1.5), and high thrombotic risk (7.7 ± 1.2). Dicoumarins were preferred in cases of severe (1.2 ± 0.4) or moderate (4.2 ± 2.5) kidney failure, good control with dicoumarins (2.3 ± 1.5), cognitive impairment (3.2 ± 3), and low haemorrhagic risk (4.3 ± 3). Age, sex, weight, cost of drug, polymedication, and low thrombotic risk achieved intermediate scores. There were no differences between the different specialists or Spanish regions. Conclusions The presence of a high thrombotic or haemorrhagic risk and the failure of previous dicoumarin therapy lead to choosing a new oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, while kidney failure, cognitive impairment, good control with dicoumarins, and a low bleeding risk predispose to selecting a classic dicoumarin anticoagulant.Objetivo: Estudios recientes han demostrado la eficacia y la seguridad de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales (NACO) en la prevención de tromboembolias en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV). Nuestro objetivo es evaluar qué factores influyen en los médicos para elegir entre dicumarínicos o NACO. Diseño: Se analizaron distintas variables, que fueron discutidas y puntuadas siguiendo una metodología Workmat®. Emplazamiento: Se realizaron 6 reuniones regionales en España (Levante, Cataluña, Andalucía-Extremadura, Madrid, Noroeste y Norte de España). Participantes: Participaron 39 especialistas (cardiólogos, neurólogos, hematólogos, internistas y médicos de urgencias y atención primaria). Mediciones: Cada participante puntuó de 1 a 10 (de menor a mayor) el grado de acuerdo con cada variable analizada. Resultados: Se elegiría preferiblemente un NACO en pacientes con fracaso previo del tratamiento dicumarínico (9,7±0,5), riesgo hemorrágico elevado (8,7 ±1) antecedentes de hemorragia (7,8±1,5) y riesgo trombótico alto (7,7±1,2). Se decantarían por un dicumarínico en casos de disfunción renal grave (1,2±0.4) o moderada (4,2±2,5), buen control con dicumarínicos (2,3±1,5), deterioro cognitivo (3,2±3) y riesgo hemorrágico bajo (4,3±3). La edad, el sexo, el peso, el coste del fármaco, la polimedicación y la existencia de un riesgo trombótico bajo obtuvieron puntuaciones intermedias. Conclusiones: El riesgo trombótico y hemorrágico elevado y el fracaso del tratamiento previo con dicumarínicos predisponen a elegir un NACO. La insuficiencia renal, el deterioro cognitivo, el buen control con dicumarínicos y un riesgo hemorrágico bajo inclinan a decantarse por un dicumarínico clásicoEste estudio ha sido financiado por la Alianza Bristol-Myer-Squibb/Pfizer2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U.Departamento de MedicinaFacultad de MedicinaInstituto de Investigación del Hospital de La Princesa (IP)20162016-10-01research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/678043https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.11.004reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAMinstname:Universidad Autónoma de MadridEspañolspaopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/6780432026-06-23T12:46:27Z
score 15,300719