La autoridad de El Parnaso español y Las tres musas últimas castellanas: criterio editorial para la poesía de Quevedo
This article analyses the dispositio and other editorial elements —recurrences of poems, titles and notes— of the Quevedo’s poetry in El Parnaso español (1648) and Las tres musas últimas castellanas (1670). The data reveal the participation of the editorial organizers (González de Salas and Aldrete)...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2013 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/38551 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/38551 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Poesía edition, poetry, Edición |
| Sumario: | This article analyses the dispositio and other editorial elements —recurrences of poems, titles and notes— of the Quevedo’s poetry in El Parnaso español (1648) and Las tres musas últimas castellanas (1670). The data reveal the participation of the editorial organizers (González de Salas and Aldrete) in some aspects of their design and it may argue about the pretended correspondence between those books and the last wish of Quevedo. Nevertheless, the author of this article proposes to edit entirely El Parnaso and Las tres musas —correcting only the misprints and removing the apocryphal poems—, because changing them we risk to loose the traces of the original Quevedo’s plan about the edition of his poetry and we would alter Quevedo’s own poetry, that is to say, the way it has been transmitted and read from the 17th century to the 20th. |
|---|