Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults

[EN]Objectives: We aimed to compare the utility and validity of two popular socio-dental indicators (OIDP and OHIP-14) for describing the impact of oral conditions on quality of life applied simultaneously. Study design: We recruited a consecutive sample of 270 healthy Spanish workers visiting the E...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Montero Martín, Javier, López Marcos, Joaquín Francisco, Vicente Galindo, María Purificación, Galindo Villardón, Purificación, Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto Francisco, Bravo Pérez, Manuel
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/154588
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154588
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:OIDP
OHIP-14
Calidad de vida
Adultos españoles
Ciencias médicas
Odontología
id ES_9cf65faf901389366efde733ee6a855f
oai_identifier_str oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/154588
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adultsMontero Martín, JavierLópez Marcos, Joaquín FranciscoVicente Galindo, María PurificaciónGalindo Villardón, PurificaciónAlbaladejo Martínez, Alberto FranciscoBravo Pérez, ManuelOIDPOHIP-14Calidad de vidaAdultos españolesCiencias médicasOdontología[EN]Objectives: We aimed to compare the utility and validity of two popular socio-dental indicators (OIDP and OHIP-14) for describing the impact of oral conditions on quality of life applied simultaneously. Study design: We recruited a consecutive sample of 270 healthy Spanish workers visiting the Employment Risk Prevention Centre for a routine medical check-up. OHIP-14 was self-completed before the oral examination and the face to face interview of the OIDP was performed. Both instruments were compared by evaluating its reliability and its validity. Results and conclusions: The standardised Cronbach alphas for OHIP-14 and OIDP were 0.89 and 0.74 respectively. OIDP showed lower face validity but higher content validity than OHIP-14. Both indicators showed high construct and criterion validity, since individuals perceiving need for dental treatment or having any complaint about their mouth obtained significantly higher total OIDP and OHIP scores than their counterparts. The prevalence of impacts was much higher using the OHIP (80.7%) than the OIDP (27.8%).Medicina Oral S.L202420242011info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/154588reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamancainstname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)InglésAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1545882026-06-07T06:28:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
title Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
spellingShingle Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
Montero Martín, Javier
OIDP
OHIP-14
Calidad de vida
Adultos españoles
Ciencias médicas
Odontología
title_short Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
title_full Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
title_fullStr Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
title_sort Comparative validity of the OIDP and OHIP-14 in describing the impact of oral health on quality of life in a cross-sectional study performed in Spanish adults
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Montero Martín, Javier
López Marcos, Joaquín Francisco
Vicente Galindo, María Purificación
Galindo Villardón, Purificación
Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto Francisco
Bravo Pérez, Manuel
author Montero Martín, Javier
author_facet Montero Martín, Javier
López Marcos, Joaquín Francisco
Vicente Galindo, María Purificación
Galindo Villardón, Purificación
Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto Francisco
Bravo Pérez, Manuel
author_role author
author2 López Marcos, Joaquín Francisco
Vicente Galindo, María Purificación
Galindo Villardón, Purificación
Albaladejo Martínez, Alberto Francisco
Bravo Pérez, Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv OIDP
OHIP-14
Calidad de vida
Adultos españoles
Ciencias médicas
Odontología
topic OIDP
OHIP-14
Calidad de vida
Adultos españoles
Ciencias médicas
Odontología
description [EN]Objectives: We aimed to compare the utility and validity of two popular socio-dental indicators (OIDP and OHIP-14) for describing the impact of oral conditions on quality of life applied simultaneously. Study design: We recruited a consecutive sample of 270 healthy Spanish workers visiting the Employment Risk Prevention Centre for a routine medical check-up. OHIP-14 was self-completed before the oral examination and the face to face interview of the OIDP was performed. Both instruments were compared by evaluating its reliability and its validity. Results and conclusions: The standardised Cronbach alphas for OHIP-14 and OIDP were 0.89 and 0.74 respectively. OIDP showed lower face validity but higher content validity than OHIP-14. Both indicators showed high construct and criterion validity, since individuals perceiving need for dental treatment or having any complaint about their mouth obtained significantly higher total OIDP and OHIP scores than their counterparts. The prevalence of impacts was much higher using the OHIP (80.7%) than the OIDP (27.8%).
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154588
url http://hdl.handle.net/10366/154588
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Oral S.L
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Oral S.L
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
instname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
instname_str Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
reponame_str GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
collection GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414703030075392
score 15,300719

Registos relacionados