Charisiana IV: ¿inavratae o inavrate? vaivenes de una variante (Char. gramm. p. 262, 27-8)
This paper deals with some shocking nominal items in a list of adverbs in Charisius’ Ars grammatica. We pay particular attention to the lemma inaurate, subject to controversy from the beginning of the textual transmission. We provide a coherent picture in terms of both textual criticism and the gram...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Huelva (UHU) |
| Repositorio: | Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/11579 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10272/11579 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Charisius and Iulius Romanus Adverbs Textual criticism Carisio y Julio Romano Adverbios Crítica textual |
| Resumo: | This paper deals with some shocking nominal items in a list of adverbs in Charisius’ Ars grammatica. We pay particular attention to the lemma inaurate, subject to controversy from the beginning of the textual transmission. We provide a coherent picture in terms of both textual criticism and the grammatical tradition |
|---|