Physical Demands in the Worst-Case Scenarios of Elite Futsal Referees Using a Local Positioning System

The aim of this study is to analyze the worst-case scenarios of professional futsal referees during the first and second half of official matches in the Spanish Futsal Cup using a Local Positioning System (LPS) for monitoring their movement patterns. Eight professional futsal referees (40 ± 3.43 yea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martínez Torremocha, Gemma, Sánchez Sánchez, Javier, Alonso Callejo, Antonio, Martín Sánchez, María Luisa, Serrano Luengo, Carlos, Gallardo Guerrero, Leonor, García Unanue, Jorge Fernando, Felipe Hernández, José Luis
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repositorio:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/12372
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12372
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Fútbol
Medicina deportiva
Tecnología médica
Efectos fisiológicos
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of this study is to analyze the worst-case scenarios of professional futsal referees during the first and second half of official matches in the Spanish Futsal Cup using a Local Positioning System (LPS) for monitoring their movement patterns. Eight professional futsal referees (40 ± 3.43 years; 1.80 ± 0.03 m; 72.84 ± 4.01 kg) participated in the study. The external load (total distance, high-speed running distance and efforts, sprint distance and efforts, and accelerations and decelerations distances) of the referees was monitored and collected using an LPS. The results revealed significant differences in the worst-case scenarios of the futsal referees during the match according to the time window analyzed (p < 0.05). The longest time windows (120 s, 180 s, and 300 s) showed lower relative total distances in the worst-case scenarios (p < 0.05). The high-speed running distances were significatively higher in the first half for the 120 s (+2.65 m·min−1; ES: 1.25), 180 s (+1.55 m·min−1; ES: 1.28), and 300 s (+0.95 m·min−1; ES: 1.14) time windows (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the first and second half for the high-intensity deceleration distance (p > 0.05). These results will serve to prepare the referees in the best conditions for the competition and adapt the training plans to the worst-case scenarios.