European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession

The paper’s main objective is to analyze the collective bargaining response in terms of internal flexibility during the Great Recession (GR) in five EU countries (Spain, Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom), and three economic sectors (industry, commerce and hospitality, and financial services an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ruesga Benito, Santos M., Heredero de Pablos, María Isabel, Da Silva Bichara, Julimar, Pérez Ortiz, Laura, Viñas Apaolaza, Ana Isabel, Monsueto, Sandro Eduardo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repositorio:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/9552
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11268/9552
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Europa
Economía
Crisis económicas
Unión Europea
Recesión económica
id ES_9b96229e14b879232c27f6455e596ec9
oai_identifier_str oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/9552
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great RecessionRuesga Benito, Santos M.Heredero de Pablos, María IsabelDa Silva Bichara, JulimarPérez Ortiz, LauraViñas Apaolaza, Ana IsabelMonsueto, Sandro EduardoEuropaEconomíaCrisis económicasUnión EuropeaEconomíaRecesión económicaThe paper’s main objective is to analyze the collective bargaining response in terms of internal flexibility during the Great Recession (GR) in five EU countries (Spain, Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom), and three economic sectors (industry, commerce and hospitality, and financial services and real estate), at the establishment level (ECS2013 database). The theoretical framework used is linked to the varieties of unionism and to the debate on the tendency towards the international homogenization or heterogenization of collective bargaining between the European Union countries. Using a descriptive statistical analysis and a probit model, this paper presents new evidences. However, the responses were heterogeneous between countries and sectors, the use of internal functional flexibility has been more intense than the numerical and salary internal flexibility. Moreover, it is related to the intensity of GR. These results, in general, while requiring a more detailed analysis of the effects of the GR on internal flexibility in the EU countries, contribute to introducing a new perspective in the socioeconomic literature about the collective bargaining and internal flexibility.20202020-11-2820202020-01-0120202020-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/9552reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científicainstname:Universidad Europea (UEM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/95522026-06-11T12:41:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
title European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
spellingShingle European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
Ruesga Benito, Santos M.
Europa
Economía
Crisis económicas
Unión Europea
Economía
Recesión económica
title_short European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
title_full European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
title_fullStr European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
title_full_unstemmed European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
title_sort European Union: Collective bargaining and internal flexibility during the Great Recession
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruesga Benito, Santos M.
Heredero de Pablos, María Isabel
Da Silva Bichara, Julimar
Pérez Ortiz, Laura
Viñas Apaolaza, Ana Isabel
Monsueto, Sandro Eduardo
author Ruesga Benito, Santos M.
author_facet Ruesga Benito, Santos M.
Heredero de Pablos, María Isabel
Da Silva Bichara, Julimar
Pérez Ortiz, Laura
Viñas Apaolaza, Ana Isabel
Monsueto, Sandro Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Heredero de Pablos, María Isabel
Da Silva Bichara, Julimar
Pérez Ortiz, Laura
Viñas Apaolaza, Ana Isabel
Monsueto, Sandro Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Europa
Economía
Crisis económicas
Unión Europea
Economía
Recesión económica
topic Europa
Economía
Crisis económicas
Unión Europea
Economía
Recesión económica
description The paper’s main objective is to analyze the collective bargaining response in terms of internal flexibility during the Great Recession (GR) in five EU countries (Spain, Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom), and three economic sectors (industry, commerce and hospitality, and financial services and real estate), at the establishment level (ECS2013 database). The theoretical framework used is linked to the varieties of unionism and to the debate on the tendency towards the international homogenization or heterogenization of collective bargaining between the European Union countries. Using a descriptive statistical analysis and a probit model, this paper presents new evidences. However, the responses were heterogeneous between countries and sectors, the use of internal functional flexibility has been more intense than the numerical and salary internal flexibility. Moreover, it is related to the intensity of GR. These results, in general, while requiring a more detailed analysis of the effects of the GR on internal flexibility in the EU countries, contribute to introducing a new perspective in the socioeconomic literature about the collective bargaining and internal flexibility.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-11-28
2020
2020-01-01
2020
2020-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11268/9552
url http://hdl.handle.net/11268/9552
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
instname:Universidad Europea (UEM)
instname_str Universidad Europea (UEM)
reponame_str ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
collection ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414550258843648
score 15,301603

Similares en LA Referencia