La restricción de la libertad en el tratamiento médico en huelga de hambre
The article examines the reaction due to the hunger strike of prisioners, detained or persons under state supervision. It focuses on the attitude from medical ethics and laws. It distinguises between state with constitutional quagrantees action and pots totalitarian regimes. Finally, it concludes th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | capítulo de libro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2011 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/45276 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/45276 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Terrorism Liberties Medical ethics Compulsory diet Medicina legal (Derecho) Bioética (Medicina) Filosofía del Derecho 5602.03 Filosofía del Derecho |
| Sumario: | The article examines the reaction due to the hunger strike of prisioners, detained or persons under state supervision. It focuses on the attitude from medical ethics and laws. It distinguises between state with constitutional quagrantees action and pots totalitarian regimes. Finally, it concludes that the hydratarion and nutrition from a fainting (unconscious) person cannot be considered force-fedding and disagrees with the recomendations of the World Medical Association. |
|---|