A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment

Background: Invisalign® attachments are divided into two main groups: the conventional group and the optimized group, which is also known as the SmartForce™. The aim of this study is to compare the movements produced by an optimized crescent-shaped attachment in superior incisor teeth with the movem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hassanaly, Tahara, Rabal-Solans, Ana, Mediero-Pérez, María Carmen, Nieto-Sánchez, Iván
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Repositorio:DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddfv.ufv.es:10641/7626
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10641/7626
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Orthodontics
attachments
clear aligners
orthodontic tooth movements
General Dentistry
Journal Article
Yes
yes
id ES_99ebe7a3d4f7ffb15390ef2bec04ab28
oai_identifier_str oai:ddfv.ufv.es:10641/7626
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachmentHassanaly, TaharaRabal-Solans, AnaMediero-Pérez, María CarmenNieto-Sánchez, IvánOrthodonticsattachmentsclear alignersorthodontic tooth movementsGeneral DentistryJournal ArticleYesyesBackground: Invisalign® attachments are divided into two main groups: the conventional group and the optimized group, which is also known as the SmartForce™. The aim of this study is to compare the movements produced by an optimized crescent-shaped attachment in superior incisor teeth with the movements produced by a conventional rectangular attachment (vertical and horizontal) in the same teeth. Material and Methods: This retrospective study examined the movement table of the initial ClinCheck® and the first refinement of 95 patients (mean age 44.18 ± 4.125, 40 males and 55 females). It represented 147 upper incisors divided into two groups: 87 with rectangular attachment and 60 with optimized attachment. Applying Kravitz’s accuracy formula for each movement and each tooth of interest (with attachments of interest), we underlined the effectiveness of each attachment. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis. Results: The accuracies of rotation, mesio-distal angulation and vestibulo-lingual inclination are highly significantly related to the type of attachment used on the upper lateral incisor. The optimized attachment presented greater accuracy in the rotation of the lateral incisors than the conventional attachment. However, conventional vertical attachment showed a higher accuracy (p<.01) in the mesio-distal angulation and horizontal attachments showed a higher accuracy (p<.01) in the vestibulo-lingual inclination in the same group of teeth. Conclusions: Optimized attachments rotate better lateral incisors; conventional vertical attachments are more efficient to improve mesio-distal angulation; and horizontal attachments serve best for torque movements.Facultad de Medicina20242024-01-0120242024-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10641/7626reponame:DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoriainstname:Universidad Francisco de VitoriaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddfv.ufv.es:10641/76262026-06-11T12:44:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
title A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
spellingShingle A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
Hassanaly, Tahara
Orthodontics
attachments
clear aligners
orthodontic tooth movements
General Dentistry
Journal Article
Yes
yes
title_short A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
title_full A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
title_fullStr A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
title_sort A comparison of the upper anterior teeth movements with optimized and conventional attachment
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hassanaly, Tahara
Rabal-Solans, Ana
Mediero-Pérez, María Carmen
Nieto-Sánchez, Iván
author Hassanaly, Tahara
author_facet Hassanaly, Tahara
Rabal-Solans, Ana
Mediero-Pérez, María Carmen
Nieto-Sánchez, Iván
author_role author
author2 Rabal-Solans, Ana
Mediero-Pérez, María Carmen
Nieto-Sánchez, Iván
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Facultad de Medicina
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Orthodontics
attachments
clear aligners
orthodontic tooth movements
General Dentistry
Journal Article
Yes
yes
topic Orthodontics
attachments
clear aligners
orthodontic tooth movements
General Dentistry
Journal Article
Yes
yes
description Background: Invisalign® attachments are divided into two main groups: the conventional group and the optimized group, which is also known as the SmartForce™. The aim of this study is to compare the movements produced by an optimized crescent-shaped attachment in superior incisor teeth with the movements produced by a conventional rectangular attachment (vertical and horizontal) in the same teeth. Material and Methods: This retrospective study examined the movement table of the initial ClinCheck® and the first refinement of 95 patients (mean age 44.18 ± 4.125, 40 males and 55 females). It represented 147 upper incisors divided into two groups: 87 with rectangular attachment and 60 with optimized attachment. Applying Kravitz’s accuracy formula for each movement and each tooth of interest (with attachments of interest), we underlined the effectiveness of each attachment. Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used for statistical analysis. Results: The accuracies of rotation, mesio-distal angulation and vestibulo-lingual inclination are highly significantly related to the type of attachment used on the upper lateral incisor. The optimized attachment presented greater accuracy in the rotation of the lateral incisors than the conventional attachment. However, conventional vertical attachment showed a higher accuracy (p<.01) in the mesio-distal angulation and horizontal attachments showed a higher accuracy (p<.01) in the vestibulo-lingual inclination in the same group of teeth. Conclusions: Optimized attachments rotate better lateral incisors; conventional vertical attachments are more efficient to improve mesio-distal angulation; and horizontal attachments serve best for torque movements.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024-01-01
2024
2024-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10641/7626
url https://hdl.handle.net/10641/7626
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
instname:Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
instname_str Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
reponame_str DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
collection DDFV. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414329018744832
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia