Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis

Objective: To assess the available evidence on the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in addition to first-choice cancer treatment on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), quality of life (QoL), adherence, and adverse effects of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Herranz Gómez, Aída, Cuenca Martínez, Ferran, Suso Martí, Luis, Varangot Reille, Clovis, Calatayud, Joaquín, Blanco Díaz, María, Casaña Granell, José
Format: article
Publication Date:2022
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repository:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/11631
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11268/11631
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Entrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidad
Calidad de vida
Cáncer
Deporte
Efectos fisiológicos
id ES_99ded58c37cfb4f8da92e26b3f9e7b01
oai_identifier_str oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/11631
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysisHerranz Gómez, AídaCuenca Martínez, FerranSuso Martí, LuisVarangot Reille, ClovisCalatayud, JoaquínBlanco Díaz, MaríaCasaña Granell, JoséEntrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidadCalidad de vidaCáncerDeporteEfectos fisiológicosObjective: To assess the available evidence on the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in addition to first-choice cancer treatment on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), quality of life (QoL), adherence, and adverse effects of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Methods: An umbrella review and meta-meta- analysis (MMA) was performed. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science until August 2021. Article selection, quality assessment, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The MMA were performed with a random-effects model and the summary statistics were presented in the form of forest plot with a weighted compilation of all standardized mean differences (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Seven systematic reviews were included. Regarding CRF, the addition of HIIT to cancer treatment showed statistically significant differences with a small clinical effect, compared with adding other treatments (SMD = 0.45; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.65). There was no significant difference when compared with adding moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.50). QoL showed positive results although with some controversy. Adherence to HIIT intervention was high, ranging from 54% to 100%. Regarding adverse effects, most of the systematic reviews reported none, and in the cases in which they occurred, they were mild. Conclusion: In conjunction with first-choice cancer treatment, HIIT has been shown to be an effective intervention in terms of CRF and QoL, as well as having optimal adherence rate. In addition, the implementation of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors is safe as it showed no or few adverse effects.20222022-10-2120222022-01-0120222022-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/11631reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científicainstname:Universidad Europea (UEM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/116312026-06-11T12:41:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
title Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
spellingShingle Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
Herranz Gómez, Aída
Entrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidad
Calidad de vida
Cáncer
Deporte
Efectos fisiológicos
title_short Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
title_full Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
title_sort Effectiveness of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors: An umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta- analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Herranz Gómez, Aída
Cuenca Martínez, Ferran
Suso Martí, Luis
Varangot Reille, Clovis
Calatayud, Joaquín
Blanco Díaz, María
Casaña Granell, José
author Herranz Gómez, Aída
author_facet Herranz Gómez, Aída
Cuenca Martínez, Ferran
Suso Martí, Luis
Varangot Reille, Clovis
Calatayud, Joaquín
Blanco Díaz, María
Casaña Granell, José
author_role author
author2 Cuenca Martínez, Ferran
Suso Martí, Luis
Varangot Reille, Clovis
Calatayud, Joaquín
Blanco Díaz, María
Casaña Granell, José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Entrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidad
Calidad de vida
Cáncer
Deporte
Efectos fisiológicos
topic Entrenamiento de intervalos de alta intensidad
Calidad de vida
Cáncer
Deporte
Efectos fisiológicos
description Objective: To assess the available evidence on the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in addition to first-choice cancer treatment on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), quality of life (QoL), adherence, and adverse effects of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors. Methods: An umbrella review and meta-meta- analysis (MMA) was performed. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science until August 2021. Article selection, quality assessment, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The MMA were performed with a random-effects model and the summary statistics were presented in the form of forest plot with a weighted compilation of all standardized mean differences (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Seven systematic reviews were included. Regarding CRF, the addition of HIIT to cancer treatment showed statistically significant differences with a small clinical effect, compared with adding other treatments (SMD = 0.45; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.65). There was no significant difference when compared with adding moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.50). QoL showed positive results although with some controversy. Adherence to HIIT intervention was high, ranging from 54% to 100%. Regarding adverse effects, most of the systematic reviews reported none, and in the cases in which they occurred, they were mild. Conclusion: In conjunction with first-choice cancer treatment, HIIT has been shown to be an effective intervention in terms of CRF and QoL, as well as having optimal adherence rate. In addition, the implementation of HIIT in patients with cancer or cancer survivors is safe as it showed no or few adverse effects.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-10-21
2022
2022-01-01
2022
2022-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11268/11631
url http://hdl.handle.net/11268/11631
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
instname:Universidad Europea (UEM)
instname_str Universidad Europea (UEM)
reponame_str ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
collection ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869414324730068992
score 15,198674

Similar Items