An analysis of interactive and interactional strategies in Conclusions and Discussion sections in Masters Theses

[EN] Significant amount of literature has been dedicated to study academic and scientific writing. Prolific work has studied specific sections of Research Articles (RA) (Dudley-Evans, 1994; Parkinson, 2011). Complemen-tary to this, some studies look into variation between Native (NE) and Non-Native...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Mestre-Mestre, Eva M.|||0000-0001-5409-2025
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/108108
Acceso en línea:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/108108
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Conclusion section
Discussion section
Metadiscourse markers
Master s thesis
NE/NNE
Sección conclusiones
Sección discusión
Marcadores metadiscursivos
Tesis de master
Section conclusion
Section discussion
Marqueurs métadiscursifs
Thèses de master
NA/NNA
FILOLOGIA INGLESA
Descripción
Sumario:[EN] Significant amount of literature has been dedicated to study academic and scientific writing. Prolific work has studied specific sections of Research Articles (RA) (Dudley-Evans, 1994; Parkinson, 2011). Complemen-tary to this, some studies look into variation between Native (NE) and Non-Native (NNE) English speaking writers. Of interest are also studies exploring academic writing other than RA, as postgraduate writings (Hyland 2004), or comparing RAs to students¿ writings. The present work analyses the strategies used in the Conclusions and Discussion sections of Masters Theses (MTs) written by students based on the Metadiscourse Markers (MDM) (Hyland, 2005) they use in them. For the study, a corpus of 30 dissertations written in English (15 by NNE and 15 by NE) is compared. Noticeable NE/NNE differences have been found in the use of MDM. Some conclusions are these differences must be addressed when teaching academic writing.