Lattice properties of the sharp partial order and other related partial orders for matrices

[EN] The aim of this paper is to study lattice properties of the sharp partial order for complex matrices having index at most 1. We investigate the down-set of a fixed matrix B under this partial order via isomorphisms with two different partially ordered sets of projectors. These are the set of pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Cimadamore, Cecilia, Rueda, Laura Alicia, Verdecchia, Melina, Thome, Néstor|||0000-0001-5328-6637
Format: article
Publication Date:2025
Country:España
Institution:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repository:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/232569
Online Access:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/232569
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Sharp partial order
Hartwig-Spindelböck factorization
Lattice structure
Jordan canonical form
Description
Summary:[EN] The aim of this paper is to study lattice properties of the sharp partial order for complex matrices having index at most 1. We investigate the down-set of a fixed matrix B under this partial order via isomorphisms with two different partially ordered sets of projectors. These are the set of projectors that commute with a certain (nonsingular) block of a HartwigSpindelböck decomposition of B and the set of projectors that commute with the Jordan canonical form of that block. Using these isomorphisms, we study the lattice structure of the down-sets and we give properties of them. Necessary and sufficient conditions under which the down-set of B is a lattice were found, in which case we describe its elements completely. We also show that every down-set of B has a distinguished Boolean subalgebra and we give a description of its elements. We characterize the matrices that are above a given matrix in terms of its Jordan canonical form. Mitra (1987) showed that the set of all n × n complex matrices having index at most 1 when n ¿ 4 is not a lower semilattice. We extend this result to n = 3 and prove that it is a lower semilattice when n = 2. We also answer negatively a conjecture given by Mitra, Bhimasankaram and Malik (2010). As a last application, we characterize solutions of some matrix equations via the established isomorphisms.