Distinct neural representations during a brain–machine interface and manual reaching task in motor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and striatum

Although brain–machine interfaces (BMIs) are directly controlled by the modulation of a select local population of neurons, distributed networks consisting of cortical and subcortical areas have been implicated in learning and maintaining control. Previous work in rodents has demonstrated the involv...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Zippi, Ellen L., Shvartsman, Gabrielle F., Vendrell‑Llopis, Nuria, Wallis, Joni D., Camarena Ramón, José Miguel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Repositorio:RIUCV. Repositorio de la Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riucv.ucv.es:20.500.12466/7013
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12466/7013
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Motor cortex
Prefrontal cortex
Striatum
Brain–machine interface
Manual control
32 Ciencias Médicas
Descrição
Resumo:Although brain–machine interfaces (BMIs) are directly controlled by the modulation of a select local population of neurons, distributed networks consisting of cortical and subcortical areas have been implicated in learning and maintaining control. Previous work in rodents has demonstrated the involvement of the striatum in BMI learning. However, the prefrontal cortex has been largely ignored when studying motor BMI control despite its role in action planning, action selection, and learning abstract tasks. Here, we compare local field potentials simultaneously recorded from primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the caudate nucleus of the striatum (Cd) while nonhuman primates perform a two‑dimensional, self‑initiated, center‑out task under BMI control and manual control. Our results demonstrate the presence of distinct neural representations for BMI and manual control in M1, DLPFC, and Cd. We find that neural activity from DLPFC and M1 best distinguishes control types at the go cue and target acquisition, respectively, while M1 best predicts target‑direction at both task events. We also find effective connectivity from DLPFC → M1 throughout both control types and Cd → M1 during BMI control. These results suggest distributed network activity between M1, DLPFC, and Cd during BMI control that is similar yet distinct from manual control.