Is Your Fund Watching Out for You?

Correcting underperforming funds and safeguarding shareholder interests. In this paper, we investigate whether boards and advisors prioritize for shareholder interests. Our objective is to understand whether actively managed equity funds that do not beat their benchmarks take any action, measured in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vidal García, Marta Esmeralda, Molero González, Laura, Trinidad Segovia, Juan E., Vidal García, Javier
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repositorio:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/16160
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11268/16160
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Inversión
Empresa
Finanzas
Goal 8: Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all
Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Descripción
Sumario:Correcting underperforming funds and safeguarding shareholder interests. In this paper, we investigate whether boards and advisors prioritize for shareholder interests. Our objective is to understand whether actively managed equity funds that do not beat their benchmarks take any action, measured in a variety of ways, to correct poor performance. On average, less than onethird of actively managed equity mutual funds beat their benchmarks, and 61 % of equity funds have lagged the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index over the past ten years. Our results suggest that most mutual funds take actions to reverse their fund performance, up to 63 %. Removing the fund manager is the most common action taken to reverse performance. However, we do find that the majority of funds still perform poorly two and three years later. In particular, we find that 67 % of funds present negative alphas two years after an action and 70 % of funds underperform three years afterward. Finally, we show that the performance flow relation suggests that fund actions are preceded by lower asset flows, thus limiting the investment advisory fees charged by funds in the pre-action years.