Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease

Background: Menière's disease (MD) is a disorder characterized by auditory and vestibular dysfunction that significantly deteriorates patients' quality of life (QoL). In addition to the management of vestibular symptoms, some patients with bilateral hearing loss meet criteria for cochlear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sánchez Cuadrado, Isabel, Calvino, Miryam, Morales-Puebla, Jose Manuel, Gavilán Bouzas, Javier, Mato, Teresa, Peñarrocha, Julio, Prim, Maria Pilar, Lassaletta Atienza, Luis María
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Repositorio:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/716831
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10486/716831
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.670137
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:cochlear implant
hearing loss
labyrinthectomy
matched-control evaluation
Meniere's disease
quality of life
quality of sound
vestibular neurectomy
Medicina
id ES_9443fcb3d36d1bc0838d7afbb5fbf5ba
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/716831
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's DiseaseSánchez Cuadrado, IsabelCalvino, MiryamMorales-Puebla, Jose ManuelGavilán Bouzas, JavierMato, TeresaPeñarrocha, JulioPrim, Maria PilarLassaletta Atienza, Luis Maríacochlear implanthearing losslabyrinthectomymatched-control evaluationMeniere's diseasequality of lifequality of soundvestibular neurectomyMedicinaBackground: Menière's disease (MD) is a disorder characterized by auditory and vestibular dysfunction that significantly deteriorates patients' quality of life (QoL). In addition to the management of vestibular symptoms, some patients with bilateral hearing loss meet criteria for cochlear implantation (CI). Objectives: (1) To assess hearing results and QoL outcomes following CI in patients with MD. (2) To compare these results to a matched control group of patients who had undergone CI. (3) To analyse differences in MD patients who have undergone simultaneous or sequential labyrinthectomy or previous neurectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a study group of 18 implanted patients with MD and a matched control group of 18 implanted patients without MD, who had CI at a tertiary referral center. Hearing and speech understanding were assessed via pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and disyllabic perception tests in quiet. QoL was assessed via the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). The impact of MD ablative surgeries was analyzed in the study group (MD group). Results: Mean pre-operative PTA thresholds were significantly lower in the MD group (103 vs. 121 dB). A significant improvement in hearing outcomes was observed following CI in both groups (p < 0.001), with a maximum Speech Discrimination Score of 64 and 65% disyllables at 65 dB for the MD and control group, respectively. Subjective outcomes, as measured by the NCIQ, GBI, SSQ12, and HISQUI19 did not significantly differ between groups. In the MD group, despite achieving similar hearing results, QoL outcomes were worse in patients who underwent simultaneous CI and labyrinthectomy compared to the rest of the MD group. Post-operative NCIQ results were significantly better in patients who had undergone a previous retrosigmoid neurectomy when compared to those who had undergone only CI surgery in the subdomains “basic sound perception” (p = 0.038), “speech” (p = 0.005), “activity” (p = 0.038), and “social interactions” (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Patients with MD and severe hearing loss obtain hearing results and QoL benefits similar to other CI candidates. Delayed CI after labyrinthectomy or vestibular neurectomy can be performed with similar or better results, respectively, to those of other cochlear implanted patients. Patients who undergo simultaneous CI and labyrinthectomy may achieve similar hearing results but careful pre-operative counseling is neededFrontiers MediaDepartamento de CirugíaFacultad de Medicina20212021-06-17research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/716831https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.670137reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAMinstname:Universidad Autónoma de MadridInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/7168312026-06-23T12:46:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
title Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
spellingShingle Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
Sánchez Cuadrado, Isabel
cochlear implant
hearing loss
labyrinthectomy
matched-control evaluation
Meniere's disease
quality of life
quality of sound
vestibular neurectomy
Medicina
title_short Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
title_full Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
title_fullStr Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
title_sort Quality of Life Following Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Menière's Disease
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sánchez Cuadrado, Isabel
Calvino, Miryam
Morales-Puebla, Jose Manuel
Gavilán Bouzas, Javier
Mato, Teresa
Peñarrocha, Julio
Prim, Maria Pilar
Lassaletta Atienza, Luis María
author Sánchez Cuadrado, Isabel
author_facet Sánchez Cuadrado, Isabel
Calvino, Miryam
Morales-Puebla, Jose Manuel
Gavilán Bouzas, Javier
Mato, Teresa
Peñarrocha, Julio
Prim, Maria Pilar
Lassaletta Atienza, Luis María
author_role author
author2 Calvino, Miryam
Morales-Puebla, Jose Manuel
Gavilán Bouzas, Javier
Mato, Teresa
Peñarrocha, Julio
Prim, Maria Pilar
Lassaletta Atienza, Luis María
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Cirugía
Facultad de Medicina
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv cochlear implant
hearing loss
labyrinthectomy
matched-control evaluation
Meniere's disease
quality of life
quality of sound
vestibular neurectomy
Medicina
topic cochlear implant
hearing loss
labyrinthectomy
matched-control evaluation
Meniere's disease
quality of life
quality of sound
vestibular neurectomy
Medicina
description Background: Menière's disease (MD) is a disorder characterized by auditory and vestibular dysfunction that significantly deteriorates patients' quality of life (QoL). In addition to the management of vestibular symptoms, some patients with bilateral hearing loss meet criteria for cochlear implantation (CI). Objectives: (1) To assess hearing results and QoL outcomes following CI in patients with MD. (2) To compare these results to a matched control group of patients who had undergone CI. (3) To analyse differences in MD patients who have undergone simultaneous or sequential labyrinthectomy or previous neurectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a study group of 18 implanted patients with MD and a matched control group of 18 implanted patients without MD, who had CI at a tertiary referral center. Hearing and speech understanding were assessed via pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and disyllabic perception tests in quiet. QoL was assessed via the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). The impact of MD ablative surgeries was analyzed in the study group (MD group). Results: Mean pre-operative PTA thresholds were significantly lower in the MD group (103 vs. 121 dB). A significant improvement in hearing outcomes was observed following CI in both groups (p < 0.001), with a maximum Speech Discrimination Score of 64 and 65% disyllables at 65 dB for the MD and control group, respectively. Subjective outcomes, as measured by the NCIQ, GBI, SSQ12, and HISQUI19 did not significantly differ between groups. In the MD group, despite achieving similar hearing results, QoL outcomes were worse in patients who underwent simultaneous CI and labyrinthectomy compared to the rest of the MD group. Post-operative NCIQ results were significantly better in patients who had undergone a previous retrosigmoid neurectomy when compared to those who had undergone only CI surgery in the subdomains “basic sound perception” (p = 0.038), “speech” (p = 0.005), “activity” (p = 0.038), and “social interactions” (p = 0.038). Conclusion: Patients with MD and severe hearing loss obtain hearing results and QoL benefits similar to other CI candidates. Delayed CI after labyrinthectomy or vestibular neurectomy can be performed with similar or better results, respectively, to those of other cochlear implanted patients. Patients who undergo simultaneous CI and labyrinthectomy may achieve similar hearing results but careful pre-operative counseling is needed
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-06-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10486/716831
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.670137
url http://hdl.handle.net/10486/716831
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.670137
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
instname:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
instname_str Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
reponame_str Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
collection Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869413664538230784
score 15,811543