El acto parlamentario y su control jurisdiccional
The purpose of this work is to deal with several questions raised by Parliamentary law-specifically, the concept of parliamentary act and its judicial review. The aim of contemporary constitutionalism is seemingly in significant conflict with the idea of parliamentary sovereignty, especially where c...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Asamblea de Madrid |
| Repositório: | Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revista.asambleamadrid.es:article/120 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revista.asambleamadrid.es/index.php/rvam/article/view/120 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Teoría del acto parlamentario interna corporis Tribunal Constitucional control jurisdiccional soberanía parlamentaria Parliamentary act parliamentary sovereignty interna corporis theory internal proceedings Constitutional Court judicial review |
| Resumo: | The purpose of this work is to deal with several questions raised by Parliamentary law-specifically, the concept of parliamentary act and its judicial review. The aim of contemporary constitutionalism is seemingly in significant conflict with the idea of parliamentary sovereignty, especially where constitutionalism is safeguarded through judicial review. This paper provides a circumscribed theory of parliamentary act, which seeks a critical approach to its control, particularly by means of judicial review. Parliamentary action could be verified by different instruments, either through internal proceedings, or through judicial review. Although this question encounters considerable difficulties when explaining the development of an effective and respectful control, this work attempts to focus chiefly on the need of this judicial review, not only because it is an essential safeguard to maintain the standards of law, but also because a more completely control means a better democracy. |
|---|