A comparative analysis of two thermoeconomic diagnosis methodologies in a building heating and DHW facility
Concerning the building environment HVAC facilities, even if a great effort has been made in developing components and systems with high nominal efficiencies, less attention has been paid to the problem of system maintenance. The main objective of the thermoeconomic diagnosis is to detect possible a...
| Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Publication Date: | 2017 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Universidad del País Vasco |
| Repository: | Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/71322 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10810/71322 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | thermoeconomic diagnosis dynamic behaviour malfunction and dysfunction characteristic curves multi-fault |
| Summary: | Concerning the building environment HVAC facilities, even if a great effort has been made in developing components and systems with high nominal efficiencies, less attention has been paid to the problem of system maintenance. The main objective of the thermoeconomic diagnosis is to detect possible anomalies and their location inside a component of the energy system. The second objective, and indeed the one to be achieved in this paper, is indicated as inverse problem. It is associated with the quantification of the effects of anomalies in terms of thermoeconomic quantities. Its rigorous application in building thermal installations has some difficulties relating to the strong interrelation between the different components and the fact that energy supply facilities are continuously changing with time. The way to deal with dynamic circumstances is thoroughly explored in this article. Likewise, this paper’s main goal is to demonstrate an application of two thermoeconomic diagnosis methodologies in the building sector, one based on the malfunction and dysfunction analysis and the other one based on the characteristic curves of the components. The results obtained allow us to point out the advantages and limitations of both methodologies as well as to combine them and then develop a more reliable diagnosis. |
|---|