Género, pluralismo e innovación epistémicamente responsable
[EN] This article critically examines the framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) from a feminist and pluralist perspective, highlighting its epistemic limitations and proposing its reformulation in terms of epistemically responsible innovation. It is argued that, although RRI promote...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/423880 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/423880 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Innovation Epistemic responsibility Feminist epistemologies Epistemic pluralism Gender Innovación Responsabilidad epistémica Epistemologías feministas Pluralismo epistémico Género Inovação Responsabilidade epistémica Epistemology Womens liberation movement |
| Sumario: | [EN] This article critically examines the framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) from a feminist and pluralist perspective, highlighting its epistemic limitations and proposing its reformulation in terms of epistemically responsible innovation. It is argued that, although RRI promotes the anticipation of impacts and public participation, it has maintained a technocratic conception of responsibility without revisiting the epistemological assumptions that structure innovation. Responsible innovation, yes, but responsible with whom, for whom, and under what criteria? Drawing on feminist epistemologies and the Gendered Innovations approach, it is argued that integrating gender analysis not only improves equity but also produces more robust knowledge and more effective technologies. This article advocates for a model of epistemically responsible innovation based on epistemic pluralism and epistemic responsibility, capable of redistributing epistemic authority, recognizing marginalized knowledge, and instituting frameworks of collective responsibility. Rather than merely managing risks, it proposes innovation aimed at transforming the structural conditions of knowledge production, incorporating voices, bodies, and values historically excluded. RRI, thus understood, is not only an ethical imperative, but also an epistemological strategy for expanding the boundaries of what is possible in science and technology |
|---|