Interpreting AI-Generated Art: Arthur Danto’s Perspective on Intention, Authorship, and Creative Traditions in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Arthur C. Danto did not live to witness the proliferation of AI in artistic creation. However, his philosophy of art offers key ideas about art that can provide an interesting perspective on artwork generated by artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, I analyze how his ideas about contemporar...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Cascales-Tornel, R. (Raquel)|||/items/6a35c05f-8266-4e73-9d0a-667b14499453
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Navarra
Repositório:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/113336
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/113336
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Arthur Danto
AI-Generated Art
Authorship in AI-Generated Art
Intention in Art
Interpretation of AI Art
Descrição
Resumo:Arthur C. Danto did not live to witness the proliferation of AI in artistic creation. However, his philosophy of art offers key ideas about art that can provide an interesting perspective on artwork generated by artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, I analyze how his ideas about contemporary art, intention, interpretation, and authorship could be applied to the ongoing debate about AI and artistic creation. At the same time, it is also interesting to consider whether the incorporation of AI into artistic creation marks a new chapter in the narrative, which seems to have reached its end, or if it represents a significant rupture with past artistic traditions.