Determining the Ground Reaction Force Value and Location for Each Foot During Bipedal Stance Exercises from a Single Forceplate

In the study of biomechanical models, balance represents a complex problem due to the issue of indeterminate forces while standing. In order to solve this problem, it is essential to measure the ground reaction forces (GRFs) applied to each foot independently. The present work proposes a methodology...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Schmedling Casas, Adrián, Macho Mier, Erik, Campa Gómez, Francisco Javier, Valenzuela Montes, Rubén, Díez Sánchez, Mikel, Corral Saiz, Javier, Diego Martín, Paul, Herrero Villalibre, Saioa, Pinto Cámara, Charles Richard
Format: article
Publication Date:2025
Country:España
Institution:Universidad del País Vasco
Repository:Addi. Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación
OAI Identifier:oai:addi.ehu.eus:10810/77356
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10810/77356
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:biomechanics
ground reaction force
center of pressure
bipedal stance
neural networks
Description
Summary:In the study of biomechanical models, balance represents a complex problem due to the issue of indeterminate forces while standing. In order to solve this problem, it is essential to measure the ground reaction forces (GRFs) applied to each foot independently. The present work proposes a methodology for determining the independent GRF applied to each foot while standing when only one forceplate is available. For this purpose, an analytical method is proposed to determine the distribution of vertical GRFs and the position of the independent center of pressure (CoP) in each foot. Concurrently, several neural network (NN) models are trained to improve the results obtained. This hypothesis is experimentally validated by a self-developed device that allows one to simultaneously obtain the vertical GRF and CoP location of each foot at the same time that the GRF and the global CoP location are obtained from a single forceplate. The results obtained achieve a CoP position error of less than 8% and a vertical force error of 2%. The analytical hypothesis is demonstrated to offer a satisfactory level of precision, while the NN is shown to result in considerable improvement in some cases.