Machine learning methods for the prediction of non-metallic inclusions in steel wires for tire reinforcement
ABSTRACT: Non-metallic inclusions are unavoidably produced during steel casting resulting in lower mechanical strength and other detrimental effects. This study was aimed at developing a reliable Machine Learning algorithm to classify castings of steel for tire reinforcement depending on the number...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Cantabria (UC) |
| Repositorio: | UCrea Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de Cantabria |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.unican.es:10902/16903 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10902/16903 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Machine learning Steel wire Continuous casting Non-metallic inclusions Random Forest Imbalanced dataset Aprendizaje automático Alambrón de acero Colada continua Inclusiones no metálicas Conjunto de datos desequilibrado |
| Sumario: | ABSTRACT: Non-metallic inclusions are unavoidably produced during steel casting resulting in lower mechanical strength and other detrimental effects. This study was aimed at developing a reliable Machine Learning algorithm to classify castings of steel for tire reinforcement depending on the number and properties of inclusions, experimentally determined. 855 observations were available for training, validation and testing the algorithms, obtained from the quality control of the steel. 140 parameters are monitored during fabrication, which are the features of the analysis; the output is 1 or 0 depending on whether the casting is rejected or not. The following algorithms have been employed: Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Classifier (linear and RBF kernels), Random Forests, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting and Artificial Neural Networks. The reduced value of the rejection rate implies that classification must be carried out on an imbalanced dataset. Resampling methods and specific scores for imbalanced datasets (Recall, Precision and AUC rather than Accuracy) were used. Random Forest was the most successful method providing an AUC in the test set of 0.85. No significant improvements were detected after resampling. The improvement derived from implementing this algorithm in the sampling procedure for quality control during steelmaking has been quantified. In this sense, it has been proved that this tool allows the samples with a higher probability of being rejected to be selected, thus improving the effectiveness of the quality control. In addition, the optimized Random Forest has enabled to identify the most important features, which have been satisfactorily interpreted on a metallurgical basis. |
|---|