Exploring different FEM strategies for hydro-mechanical coupled gas injection simulation in clay materials
Over the last few decades, the study of gas injection in porous media, particularly under multi-field coupled conditions, has emerged as a prominent focus within the field of geotechnical engineering. This article presents a comprehensive comparison of three numerical strategies, evaluating their im...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/420902 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/420902 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2024.100582 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | HM-coupled simulations Gas injection Porous media Selective integration Mixed finite element method Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geotècnia::Mecànica de sòls |
| Sumario: | Over the last few decades, the study of gas injection in porous media, particularly under multi-field coupled conditions, has emerged as a prominent focus within the field of geotechnical engineering. This article presents a comprehensive comparison of three numerical strategies, evaluating their impact on computational efficiency and result accuracy during Hydro-Mechanical (HM) coupled simulations of gas injection in clay-based geomaterials. This comprehensive comparison encompasses three numerical simulation methods for the mechanical sub-problem: The Standard Finite Element Method (SFEM), the Standard Finite Element Method with Selective Integration (SFEM+SI), and the Mixed Finite Element Method (MFEM). The Heat and Gas Fracking model (HGFRAC) is introduced to illustrate the computational characteristics of these methods. The results indicate that the effective application of SFEM is heavily dependent on a high-precision mesh. Convergence issues may arise when dealing with relatively coarse meshes. Nevertheless, these convergence issues can be effectively mitigated by incorporating either the Selective Integration method or the MFEM formulations. In terms of computational efficiency, it is evident that the SFEM+SI method demonstrates higher efficiency than SFEM and MFEM. However, it is noteworthy that the computed gas flow patterns of SFEM and SFEM+SI can be affected by the alignment of the mesh. With MFEM, displacements and strains are calculated as independent unknowns, enhancing result accuracy and achieving mesh independence. |
|---|