Biografía de los Trabajos de Fin de Grado en una Facultad de Sociología: incertidumbres, triangulación metodológica e implicaciones prácticas

[EN] This article is focused on the evolution of the undergraduate dissertation in the Sociology Degree of A Coruña University since its implementation in the academic year 2011-12. Our main analytical objective is to explore how the main difficulties perceived by the students have been identified a...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Otero Enríquez, Raimundo, Rodríguez Teijeiro, Ariadna, Santiago Gómez, Elvira
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/114668
Acesso em linha:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/114668
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Trabajo final de grado
Triangulación metodológica
Rúbrica
Grado en Sociología
Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior
Undergraduate Dissertation
Methodological triangulation
Rubric
Sociology Degree
European Space of Higher Education
Descrição
Resumo:[EN] This article is focused on the evolution of the undergraduate dissertation in the Sociology Degree of A Coruña University since its implementation in the academic year 2011-12. Our main analytical objective is to explore how the main difficulties perceived by the students have been identified and confronted during six years. Through a methodological triangulation in which qualitative and quantitative social research techniques are combined, indicators of this particular subject are analyzed and contrasted in depth, as well as the students and teachers discourses. In particular, the content of the present work is structured in three parts that match the three temporary milestones of the implementation of the undergraduate thesis in our Faculty: the first one refers to the implementation and detection of initial problems; the second one includes the design of a new regulatory procedure for this subject that incorporates an evaluation rubric; and finally the persistence of some “uncertainties” that require next improvement measures are briefly detailed in the third part of the text.