La antropología filosófica de Nietzsche. Del humanismo cristiano «anti-natural» al naturalismo dionisiaco
This article offers a reading of <em>Homo Natura</em>. According to Löwith, Nietzsche’s <em>Homo Natura </em>points towards a form of life that is more human because it is “more natural” than a Christian humanism. I agree with Löwith that a response to Nietzsche’s <em>H...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/65997 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/65997 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Antropología filosófica naturaleza humanismo animalidad vida vegetal |
| Resumo: | This article offers a reading of <em>Homo Natura</em>. According to Löwith, Nietzsche’s <em>Homo Natura </em>points towards a form of life that is more human because it is “more natural” than a Christian humanism. I agree with Löwith that a response to Nietzsche’s <em>Homo Natura </em>requires the development of a philosophical anthropology. However, I argue that Löwith’s conception of human nature does not adequately capture the Dionysian meaning of nature in Nietzsche. |
|---|