Coastal adaptation and uncertainties: the need of ethics for a shared coastal future

Coastal hydro-morphodynamics present significant uncertainties, one order of magnitude larger for sediment transport than for the driving hydrodynamics. Met-ocean factors (waves, currents and levels essentially) are normally selected from a probability distribution, where only the central trend is c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sánchez-Arcilla Conejo, Agustín|||0000-0002-3450-6697, Gracia García, Vicente|||0000-0002-4628-426X, Mösso Aranda, César|||0000-0003-2598-1864, Cáceres Rabionet, Iván|||0000-0002-7426-7029, González Marco, Daniel|||0000-0002-9619-1897, Gómez Aguar, Jesús Javier|||0000-0002-6989-620X
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/351356
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/351356
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.717781
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Coastal zone management
Coastal
Adaptation
Uncertainty
Data
Morphodynamics
Risk
Ethics
Optimism
Enginyeria de costes -- Aspectes ambientals
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Enginyeria hidràulica, marítima i sanitària::Ports i costes
Descripción
Sumario:Coastal hydro-morphodynamics present significant uncertainties, one order of magnitude larger for sediment transport than for the driving hydrodynamics. Met-ocean factors (waves, currents and levels essentially) are normally selected from a probability distribution, where only the central trend is considered, and then the analysis of hydro-morphodynamic processes is carried out within a deterministic framework. This analysis is often based on a non-updated topo-bathymetry, with implicit error intervals for many variables, which results in uncertainties that, unless presented from an ethical perspective, tend to hinder proactive decision making and thus result in growing coastal degradation. To address this challenge, the paper starts with the uncertainty in water/sediment fluxes and resulting morphodynamic impacts under average and storm conditions, proving the need to include explicit error levels in the analysis and subsequent assessments. The paper develops this approach for field and lab data, considering how they are extrapolated to estimate key variables in coastal sustainability and engineering decisions, illustrated in terms of the longshore sand transport. Such a key variable estimation presents large uncertainties and thus requires a stricter ethical approach for extreme events, which serves to illustrate the transmission of uncertainties. The paper concludes with a short overview of the implications that these uncertainties may have for coastal risk assessments and proactive decision making, discussing how large error levels without a suitable ethical assessment may result in socio-economic mistrust, which will limit the necessary optimism to address future coastal sustainability.