RE-START: Exploring the effectiveness of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide resumption after discontinuation in migraine

Background and purpose: According to the latest European guidelines, discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP MAb) may be considered after 12-18 months of treatment. However, some patients may worsen after discontinuation. In this study, we assessed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: del Rincón, CR, Gonzalez-Martinez, A, Quintas, S, García-Azorín, D, Lázaro, IF, Guerrero-Peral, AL, Osorio, YG, Santos-Lasaosa, S, Oria, CG, Rodríguez, NS, Díez, FI, Iñiguez, AE, Luque, SG, Huerta-Villanueva, M, Díaz, SC, Muñoz-Vendrell, A, Ros, AL, Sánchez-Soblechero, A, Juanes, FV, Kortazar-Zubizarreta, I, Echeverria, A, Rodríguez-Vico, J, Sánchez, AJ, Garcia, AG, Sánchez-Mateos, NM, Belvis, R, Pérez, MPN, García-Monco, JC, Escudero, MRA, Montes, N, Gago-Veiga, AB
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2024
Country:España
Institution:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repository:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p17398
Online Access:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=17398
http://ddd.uab.cat/record/299786
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:CGRP
effectiveness
migraine
response
resumption
Description
Summary:Background and purpose: According to the latest European guidelines, discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP MAb) may be considered after 12-18 months of treatment. However, some patients may worsen after discontinuation. In this study, we assessed the response following treatment resumption. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in 14 Headache Units in Spain. We included patients with response to anti-CGRP MAb with clinical worsening after withdrawal and resumption of treatment. Numbers of monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly headache days (MHD) were obtained at four time points: before starting anti-CGRP MAb (T-baseline); last month of first treatment period (T-suspension); month of restart due to worsening (T-worsening); and 3 months after resumption (T-reintroduction). The response rate to resumption was calculated. Possible differences among periods were analysed according to MMD and MHD. Results: A total of 360 patients, 82% women, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at migraine onset of 18 (12) years. The median (IQR) MHD at T-baseline was 20 (13) and MMD was 5 (6); at T-suspension, the median (IQR) MHD was 5 (6) and MMD was 4 (5); at T-worsening, the median (IQR) MHD was 16 (13) and MMD was 12 (6); and at T-reintroduction, the median (IQR) MHD was 8 (8) and MHD was 5 (5). In the second period of treatment, a 50% response rate was achieved by 57.4% of patients in MHD and 65.8% in MMD. Multivariate models showed significant differences in MHD between the third month after reintroduction and last month before suspension of first treatment period (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results suggest that anti-CGRP MAb therapy is effective after reintroduction. However, 3 months after resumption, one third of the sample reached the same improvement as after the first treatment period.