La virtud como término medio y como extremo: La interpretación de Aspasio
It is not clear what Aristotle means when he states that virtue is a mean between two extremes in respect of its essence, but an extreme from the perspective of the good. This paper explains some of the premises of the Aristotelian theory of virtue that can be found in Aspasius’ commentary and have...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/61568 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/61568 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Comentadores de Aristóteles cuadratura definición silogismo |
| Sumario: | It is not clear what Aristotle means when he states that virtue is a mean between two extremes in respect of its essence, but an extreme from the perspective of the good. This paper explains some of the premises of the Aristotelian theory of virtue that can be found in Aspasius’ commentary and have since been neglected by the interpretive tradition, while at the same time indicating what problems remain despite Aspasius’ explanatory attempts. |
|---|